Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'tnook'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • The Consumer Forums: The Mall
    • Welcome to the Consumer Forums
    • FAQs
    • Forum Rules - Please read before posting
    • Consumer Forums website - Post Your Questions & Suggestions about this site
    • Helpful Organisations
    • The Bear Garden – for off-topic chat
  • CAG Community centre
    • CAG Community Centre Subforums:-
  • Consumer TV/Radio Listings
    • Consumer TV and Radio Listings
  • CAG Library - Please register
    • CAG library Subforums
  • Banks, Loans & Credit
    • Bank and Finance Subforums:
    • Other Institutions
  • Retail and Non-retail Goods and Services
    • Non-Retail subforums
    • Retail Subforums
  • Work, Social and Community
    • Work, Social and Community Subforums:
  • Debt problems - including homes/ mortgages, PayDay Loans
    • Debt subforums:
    • PayDay loan and other Short Term Loans subforum:
  • Motoring
    • Motoring subforums
  • Legal Forums
    • Legal Issues subforums

Categories

  • News from the National Consumer Service
  • News from the Web

Blogs

  • A Say in the Life of .....
  • Debt Diaries

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Location

Found 1 result

  1. Hi, I think this is new to CAG. I have a trading account with a forex broker. i noticed a few trades on my ledger that I hadn't authorised. On closer examination I discovered my son had been playing with my account. He has a demo account and likes to pretend to trade, but had used my live account a couple times on my iPad/iPhone. My first instinct was to write it off and blame myself for not being diligent enough. Then I came across a potential precedent. SPREADEX LTD V COCHRANE [2012] EWHC 1290 http://www.druces.com/spreadex-vs-cochrane-online-terms-did-not-form-contract/ The case is a victory for the consumer over a forex broker for a few reasons. - Contract was too onside and provided no benefit for the customer - Unreasonable to expect the customer to read the dozens of pages of T&C which are hidden behind a checkbox on a sign up page. Goes against UTTCR according to the judge. It's a long-shot but I have lodged a complaint with the broker asking for the trades to be refunded and quoted the case. If they don't respond favourably I will try the FOS route.
×
×
  • Create New...