Hi, If a well known nasty debt purchaser has put in writing account on hold whilst they investigate complaint, but you have had a dodgy stat demand, can you trust it's not just a delaying tactic, if you don't set aside dodgy stat demand? By dodgy SD I mean they had part of the Warning missing, no page number, no form ref ie 6.1. Sorry I can't scan anything at the moment! As well as that the alleged debt was in dispute about three years ago with original creditor, re. CCA as it was just an application form leaflet. I have contacted the debt purchaser and their legal dept, who state they will try to obtain agreement, they shouldn't have tried to start the bankruptcy process should they? They have stated no collection activity until after they resolve my complaint, which I bombarded them with all sorts, to several members (at the top). I asked for clarification that they are withdrawing SD, they replied with the same, no collectio activity. I don't really want to have the bother of set aside hearing with court as I am quite ill, I want them to withdraw and not petition regardless, ie when they get the copy agreement, despite me telling them it is unenforceable, as the judge may just say i've borrowed, so owe it. I am also aware of no Deed of assignment being served etc, I just wonder if it's a LOW DOWN trick or if persons have been safe in them not petitioning, when a complaint has been looked into by senior complaints department. If the SD has part of the warning information missing and no numbers on pages, does this mean it is not as prescribed, so can't be used in court?