Jump to content

Showing results for tags 'debt purchasers'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • The Consumer Forums: The Mall
    • Welcome to the Consumer Forums
    • FAQs
    • Forum Rules - Please read before posting
    • Consumer Forums website - Post Your Questions & Suggestions about this site
    • Helpful Organisations
    • The Bear Garden – for off-topic chat
  • CAG Community centre
    • CAG Community Centre Subforums:-
  • Consumer TV/Radio Listings
    • Consumer TV and Radio Listings
  • CAG Library - Please register
    • CAG library Subforums
  • Banks, Loans & Credit
    • Bank and Finance Subforums:
    • Other Institutions
  • Retail and Non-retail Goods and Services
    • Non-Retail subforums
    • Retail Subforums
  • Work, Social and Community
    • Work, Social and Community Subforums:
  • Debt problems - including homes/ mortgages, PayDay Loans
    • Debt subforums:
    • PayDay loan and other Short Term Loans subforum:
  • Motoring
    • Motoring subforums
  • Legal Forums
    • Legal Issues subforums

Categories

  • News from the National Consumer Service
  • News from the Web

Blogs

  • A Say in the Life of .....
  • Debt Diaries

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Location

Found 1 result

  1. Received wisdom has it that one should send a claimant’s solicitor a CCA as well as CPR 31.14 request when seeking to elucidate / elaborate upon particulars of claim for a debt. The reasoning is that they are under a statutory obligation to comply with the CCA but not the CPR request. However, given that the defendant can request the court to force disclosure, and that the court will most likely accede to this request, what are the added benefits of the CCA? I ask because certain debt purchasers and solicitors of note have taken to playing silly burgers when sent CCA requests (eg Carter claiming that their ‘client’ is not the creditor). I do not quite see the reason to request something, disclosure of which the court can compel anyway. I know there must be a reason, but I’m afraid it has eluded me. (doh) Enlightenment sought and graciously received. ps Sorry I didn't know there was a separate Legal forum where I maybe should have posted this.
×
×
  • Create New...