Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'cambridge'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • The Consumer Forums: The Mall
    • Welcome to the Consumer Forums
    • FAQs
    • Forum Rules - Please read before posting
    • Consumer Forums website - Post Your Questions & Suggestions about this site
    • Helpful Organisations
    • The Bear Garden – for off-topic chat
  • CAG Community centre
    • CAG Community Centre Subforums:-
  • Consumer TV/Radio Listings
    • Consumer TV and Radio Listings
  • CAG Library - Please register
    • CAG library Subforums
  • Banks, Loans & Credit
    • Bank and Finance Subforums:
    • Other Institutions
  • Retail and Non-retail Goods and Services
    • Non-Retail subforums
    • Retail Subforums
  • Work, Social and Community
    • Work, Social and Community Subforums:
  • Debt problems - including homes/ mortgages, PayDay Loans
    • Debt subforums:
    • PayDay loan and other Short Term Loans subforum:
  • Motoring
    • Motoring subforums
  • Legal Forums
    • Legal Issues subforums

Categories

  • News from the National Consumer Service
  • News from the Web

Blogs

  • A Say in the Life of .....
  • Debt Diaries

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Location

Found 3 results

  1. We will be hearing a lot more about this, but I think The Prankster has summed it up nicely. These are not 'normal' PE car parks, so the value of the win to them, is very limited I believe. They were expecting the judgement to go against them by my understanding... http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/parkingeye-win-cambridge-test-case.html
  2. I'm in need of some help here. I took my car to Autoglass at the end of August (26th, I believe it was), to have my windscreen replaced. My car was delivered to Cambridge on a trailer and I drove it the 400m to AG around 11am. I walked around the vehicle with a technician who noted various scratches and dents on the vehicle, noted that the aerial was missing and that there was a dent on the bonnet, etc etc. After I've signed the PDA that the report was being compiled on, he asked me if the windscreen wiper arms had been removed recently, as this particular model can be problematic if the arms seize onto the spindles; I told him that I'd taken them off recently to spray them black as they were faded grey, so shouldn't be a problem. All of that over, I walked back to work and awaited a call back. Around 1230, I got a phone call from AG saying that they wouldn't be completing work on the car unless I ran it to a dealership and had the wiper arms removed from the spindles. They told me that they'd seized on and that they ask all customers with problematic spindles to go back to a dealer and have the arms removed. I said that I wasn't prepared to do that, as my windscreen being 60% broken/shattered/opaque would almost certainly result in a tug by the police, that I wasn't prepared to drive the car without windscreen wipers and that it was Bank Holiday Monday and no Nissan dealers are open for Service calls! They then demanded that I removed my car from their premises, at which time, I called Sainsbury's (My insurer) customer services, who were very nice about everything and got onto a conference call with Autoglass, Sainsbury's and myself. AG kept interrupting and stating that it is my fault for bringing them a poorly maintained vehicle and that driving the car on the road was perfectly legal, at which point, I called my mechanic who is an MOT tester, on Facetime and showed him the car whilst on the works landline to the conference call. My mechanic told me that it was an MOT fail and that the vehicle would possibly be prohibited/seized if used on the road due to the danger it posed to other road users. At this point, AG were kicked off the call as all that kept happening was repetitive nonsense. I ended up getting a taxi home, which AG paid for (£124-00). The next day, AG called to say that the work on the car was complete and that one of the chaps had used WD40 to free the arms from the spindles. They advised me that my wiper mechanism was badly worn and in need of repair, but the car was serviceable and I could drive it home. Gleefully, I went to the workshop and collected my car. As I arrived, I went into the office and was told the car would be brought around in a moment and that I should sign "Here, here and here". After signing Thrice, I noticed some comments in the vehicle damage report: Wiper mechanism broken Scratches on Scuttle Panel Trim incomplete/doesn't fit Aerial Missing None of those were noted when I took the car in originally and I know that the damage to the vehicle is fresh. I also noted that I HADN'T ticked the "I accept the report to be correct" box on the paperwork. I quizzed the technician who drew my car out to me about the damage and he said "I dunno, I just got asked to bring it round mate, but the wiper arm on the passenger side is certainly not right". At this point, the woman who was on the conference call the day before, and who took my money (The site manager), ran over and quickly ushered the employee back inside, seemingly before he said something he shouldn't. I drove home, happy as larry, operated the screenwash and then I noticed the issue. The wipers squeak and drag across the screen horribly. The passenger side wiper gets dragged up the screen almost sideways and doesn't complete a single sweep without juddering. I called Sainsburys, who were great to me, they sent me a cheque for £100 and told me that they'd keep me up to date. A week later, they called me to say Autoglass were denying all knowledge of the original PDA report and to sit tight. They sent me £50 through the post to cover the phone calls and so on. Autoglass tell Sainsburys that I'm a liar, and that the vehicle was in terrible condition when it was taken to them. They also said that I dumped my car in protest and that I was responsible for the wiper arms being seized on due to over tightening. Autoglass send out a final response and invite me to complain to the FOS, after sending me the £124-00 cheque. Where do I go from here? They've clearly caused damage to my car, treated me poorly and refused to make any good of the damaged they've caused. The scuttle panel for my car is £74.00, bits in the wipers are around £80.00 + labour on both. The windscreen trim which was new at the time of fitting the windscreen, doesn't fit. Yet, Autoglass claim to use manufacturer specification parts. Where do I stand here? Someone please help; I have photos of the car, damage and scans of the receipt from AG showing that I didn't sign for the damages. Thanks in advance.
  3. I am writing this message in a sleeping bag in a dorm corridor. At least it's quite warm in here. This Saturday (2 July 2011) is the day when I graduate from the university with a MSc degree in Natural Sciences. This is an one-in-a-lifetime event, for which I invited my family to come over to the UK (I'm an international student from the EU). I have made the booking via (Hostelbookers dot com) for a guesthouse in Cambridge on 7 May 2011 for three nights starting today (Friday, July 1st), and have paid the deposit using Visa Debit. It was agreed to pay the remaining cash on arrival. However, yesterday (Thursday, June 30th) the hotel manager called me and recommended to look for alternative places to stay, because, due to the airlines strike, the people currently accommodating the dedicated room cannot leave. I did my best to find a place, but nothing affordable was available- the graduation weekend is a big thing here. Today I made sure I knew all my rights and also registered a case with the consumer rights protection agency. Afterwards, I went to the hotel and tried to somehow get a room for my family, or, in the worst case, a full compensation for a price difference of a new booking. However, the hotel manager was rude, and even somewhat offensive. He did not want to hear about any compensations and asked me to leave. He said, he would not go into any verbal discussions, but email me instead. After leaving the hotel I called several emergency numbers (obviously, all of the aforementioned calls have been recorded by the agencies. They should provide a substantial time record). Several hours later (probably around 20h) I received an email from this guy saying he is cancelling my booking, as no Credit/Debit card information has been provided. He also claims I have ignored his previous warning. Clearly, I have NEVER received any warnings about providing Debit card info. Also, I have registered my claim in several institutions well before this email. I would like to know, whether it would be possible to have the direct expenses repaid (we had to buy sleeping bags, inflatable beds, etc). Also, I have not studied for 4 yrs to go to my graduation barely alive- I would like a moral compensation for extreme difficulties this preposterous behaviour has caused to me and my family. Would you please recommended agencies I should contact as soon as possible? Thank you for you help and understanding... Also, please excuse my grammar- this day was a pure nightmare, and I'm dead tired.
×
×
  • Create New...