I need to find my contract and will let you know. Thanks all the same.

I hope somebody can help me. I have been in my property for 11 months and when I signed my contract, I requested a six month break clause. I was under the impression that after six months has lapsed, I am able to give 1 month notice at any time.My Landlord is saying because I did not request to leave the property at the 6 month deadline, I am forced to stay the full 24 months. Is this true?

Any help please?

Hi Folks, I've just received a letter in the post today. Page 1 Has a heading "Notice of Transfer of Proceedings". Page 2 reads: It is ordered that:- 1. The filing of an allocation questionaire be dispensed with in this case unless the District Judge at th ecourt transfer orders otherwise. Note: Any party affected by this Order may under Rule 3.3 (5) apply to have it set aside, varied or stayed.Such a party must apply under Rule 23.3 within 14 Days of service of this Order. **Please note that an Allocation fee may be payable in this instance.Please contact the court of transfer for further details. Pages 3,4 & 5 defence. What should I do now?

Try [NAME REMOVED] on 0207116 1944

Does anybody have any advise on what to do?

Barclays made me an offer out of court to pay all monies owed to me. I signed and accepted the offer.

I need advise on what to do. My bank Barclays settled out of court but after checking my credit file with Experien, they had actually registered a debt outstanding against my name. Is that legal? The amount is still showing as outstanding. I admit that I was in my overdraft at the time and refused to pay back the money until the court made a decision on who owes who money. Can a bank register debt against your name during litigation? I would have thought only the judge would decide if I owed the money. This is having a negative affect on my Credit Report. What can I do?

Hi Bookworm, I would appreciate it if you could move it to the Debt forum. Thank You

Guys just a quick note to let you know barlcays settled in full. Thanks for all the support. One thing though, they registered a debt against my name after I submitted a claim on MCOL. This is still showing on my credit report as outstanding. I've contact the litigation & disputes department who inturn told me to they had no idea which department was responsible for removing this amount from my account. As far as they were concerned they offered me full settlement of the account. They advised me to speak to Customer Service who transferred me to Janet Han from the complaints department only to tell me to contact the litigation and disputes department. I going around in circles here. As far as she was concerned that amount was outstanding at that point in time even thought we were in a legal dispute about who owes who money. What can I do to rectify this?

Is it the same as Barlcays 1 Churchill Place?

Can someone help me please?

:? Heres my story so far Sent off S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) request 08/03/07 Received Standard response about microfinche Sent letter giving estimation of charges due to non compliance 23/04/07 Received response offering less than half blah blah blah 27/04/07 Called up and asked should I accept this offer, would they remove all defaults on my account which I believe was the result of the penalty charges. - They said no and if I wanted to take it further I should go ahead. 01/05/07 Will be sending Letter of rejection of offer and once again requesting a full refund and the removal of any default notices on my account. Am I proceeding correctly? Can I request the removal of defaults from my account?

Thanks Mum.

Guys can you help me please? I received this letter from Royal Courts of Justice Group. Dear Sir, "RE: ****** ****** V Barclays Bank PLC 2007 – ***** formerly action non ******** Your case has been transferred to the London Mercantile Court, which is based within the Admiralty and Commercial Court at the Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London WC2A 2LL. Please see, for guidance, CPR 59 and the Practise Direction. Your Case has been allocated the number 2007 -**** this number to be used in future correspondence. There will be a Small Claims Hearing in this case and in several others which raise the same or similar issues at 9:30 on Tuesday 10th May 2007. The Hearing is intended to give directions for some or all these cases in a way which saves time and expense. It is hoped that all parties will attend but if this is not practicable the Court will be pleased to consider the written views of any party provided that these reach the Court by no later than 3rd May 2007. Although some of these cases have been allocated to Multi Track, it is the provisional view of the Judge that the cost rules for Small Claims Track should apply to all of them. Do not hesitate to contact this office with any queries you may have. Yours faithfully Alex Smith" What do I do next?