Jump to content

webbscatering

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    1,237
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by webbscatering

  1. HI Kyosanto,

    I'm still missing one payment from Wizzair for my partner and received an email stating they've paid out to a claims company but we did not authorise anyone to represent her.

    I've emailed Airhelp to see what was going on and received an email stating they had no dealings with my partner's claim!

    I'm at a loss as to what I should do, any ideas greatly appreciated

    thanks

    Webbs

    Wizzair and Airhelp Compensation Claim.pdf

  2. Defence to be filed tomorrow, so far they have not complied with my CCA or CPR request.

    Is this still the correct form to use?

    The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim vague and are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

    1. The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

    2. The Claimant claims £xxxxxx is owed under a regulated consumer credit account under reference xxxxxxxxx. I do not recall the precise details or agreement and have sought verification from the claimant and the claimants solicitor by way of a CPR 31.14 and section 78 request who are yet to fully comply.

    3. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am unable to recall the precise details of the alleged agreement or any default notice served in breach of any defaulted payments.

    4. Paragraph 3 is denied.The Defendant contends that no notice of assignment pursuant to s.136 of the Law of Property Act & s.82 A of the CCA1974 has ever been served by the Claimant as alleged or at all.

    5. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

    (a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and
    (b) show and evidence any cause of action and service of a Default Notice  pursuant to sec87(1) of the CCA1974; and
    (c) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and
    (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

    6. After receiving this claim I requested by way of a CPR 31.14 request and a section 78 request for copies of any documents referred to within the Claimants' particulars to establish what the claim is for.

    7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

    8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974.

    9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

  3. Defence to be filed tomorrow, so far they have not complied with my CCA or CPR request.

    Is this still the correct form to use?

    The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim vague and are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

    1. The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

    2. The Claimant claims £xxxxxx is owed under a regulated consumer credit account under reference xxxxxxxxx. I do not recall the precise details or agreement and have sought verification from the claimant and the claimants solicitor by way of a CPR 31.14 and section 78 request who are yet to fully comply.

    3. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am unable to recall the precise details of the alleged agreement or any default notice served in breach of any defaulted payments.

    4. Paragraph 3 is denied.The Defendant contends that no notice of assignment pursuant to s.136 of the Law of Property Act & s.82 A of the CCA1974 has ever been served by the Claimant as alleged or at all.

    5. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

    (a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and
    (b) show and evidence any cause of action and service of a Default Notice  pursuant to sec87(1) of the CCA1974; and
    (c) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and
    (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

    6. After receiving this claim I requested by way of a CPR 31.14 request and a section 78 request for copies of any documents referred to within the Claimants' particulars to establish what the claim is for.

    7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

    8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974.

    9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

  4. Defence to be filed tomorrow, so far they have not complied with my CCA or CPR request.

    Is this still the correct form to use?

    The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim vague and are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

    1. The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017.It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.

    2. The Claimant claims £xxxxxx is owed under a regulated consumer credit account under reference xxxxxxxxx. I do not recall the precise details or agreement and have sought verification from the claimant and the claimants solicitor by way of a CPR 31.14 and section 78 request who are yet to fully comply.

    3. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am unable to recall the precise details of the alleged agreement or any default notice served in breach of any defaulted payments.

    4. Paragraph 3 is denied.The Defendant contends that no notice of assignment pursuant to s.136 of the Law of Property Act & s.82 A of the CCA1974 has ever been served by the Claimant as alleged or at all.

    5. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

    (a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and
    (b) show and evidence any cause of action and service of a Default Notice  pursuant to sec87(1) of the CCA1974; and
    (c) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and
    (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

    6. After receiving this claim I requested by way of a CPR 31.14 request and a section 78 request for copies of any documents referred to within the Claimants' particulars to establish what the claim is for.

    7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

    8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974.

    9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

  5. Which Court have you received the claim from? Northampton

     Name of the Claimant? PRA Group (UK) Limited

    How many defendants joint or self? Self

    Date of issue –  7 Sep 2023

     Date  to acknowledge) = 25/09/2023

    date to submit defence = 09/10/2023 (33 days in total)   

    Particulars of Claim  

    What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 

    1.The claimant claims the sum of £2765 for outstanding debt owed.

    2.On 24/07/2017 the Defendant entered into an agreement with Lloyds Bank Plc. For a credit card 16 digit number.

    3.On 29/04/2019 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £2765.

    4. On 08/12/2020 the debt of £2765 was assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited. Notices of assignment were sent to the Defendant in accordance with S136 Law of Property Act 1925.

    AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS 1. The sum of £2765

     What is the total value of the claim? £2960
     

    Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No


     Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No
     

    Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No

    Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card
     

    When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007? After
     

    Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post? Online
     

    Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...)? Yes
     

    Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim?. Debt is assigned and Debt Purchaser has issued the claim
     

    Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No
     

    Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No
     

    Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No
     

    Why did you cease payments? I fell into debt after my wife suffered a prolapsed disc and was unable to work for a long period of time plus Covid lockdown forced us to rely on credit cards to get us by
     

    What was the date of your last payment? Unknown


    Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No 

    Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes we did make contact but no debt plan was made
     

     

  6. Which Court have you received the claim from? Northampton

     Name of the Claimant? PRA Group (UK) Limited

    How many defendants joint or self? Self

    Date of issue –  7 Sep 2023

     Date of issue  to acknowledge) = 25/09/2023

    date = 09/10/2023 (33 days in total)   

    Particulars of Claim  

    What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

    1. The claimant claims the sum of £3529 for outstanding debt owed.

    2. On 18/11/2016 the Defendant entered into an agreement with Lloyds Bank Plc. For a credit card 16 digit number.

    3. On 29/04/2019 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of £3529.

    4. On 08/12/2020 the debt of £3529 was assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited. Notices of assignment were sent to the Defendant in accordance with S136 Law of Property Act 1925.

    AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS 1. The sum of £3529

     What is the total value of the claim? £3814
     

    Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No


     Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No
     

    Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No

    Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card
     

    When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007? After
     

    Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post? Online
     

    Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...)? Yes
     

    Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim?. Debt is assigned and Debt Purchaser has issued the claim
     

    Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No
     

    Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No
     

    Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No
     

    Why did you cease payments? I fell into debt after my wife suffered a prolapsed disc and was unable to work for a long period of time plus Covid lockdown forced us to rely on credit cards to get us by
     

    What was the date of your last payment? Unknown


    Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No 

    Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes we did make contact but no debt plan was made
    Received three claims forms for credit cards taken out with Lloyds Bank in 2017, I've never had a Lloyds credit card!

    Yes I did have credit cards back in 2017 but definitely not with Lloyds Bank.

    The debt has been assigned to PRA Group (UK) Limited

     

×
×
  • Create New...