Cheers Will be in court regardless and have prepared a doc that requests judgement by default straight away. Should have requested judgement sooner but I actually wanted to attend court to see how barclays respond, no response to initial order so I just cant see them doing anything but settleing on arrival. Otherwise they may end up with severel judgements. Suprised no one on hear in southend today, can only assume all have gone for early judgement and got their money so not worried about todays events. My case originally only 195 worth of charges now up to 1350 with all cost, self lit, etc

This is the final hearing for 50 cases all barclays all subject to the same court order dated 25/7/7 and all to be heard together. In my case Barclays have not adhered to the order and I will be requesting judgement by default straight away. I was just wondering what has happened to the other 49 people and wether they had, had any correspondence with the bank or not. Seems strange that no one has mentioned this case because at the time it was big news. Particually because the order was so anti the bank, it included moving the cases to fast track so we could all claim costs and requested full disclosure from the bank.

The 50 cases that were referred together for tomorrow at Southend county court has anyone recieved anything from Barclays since the order 25/7/7? i.e settlement or any response to the order :idea:

I had a stay lifted and judgement awarded after court bundle stage. Barclays did'nt put one in so I requested judgement and was awarded everything. All paid up now:)

If you took the loan pre 2005 they know its been miss-sold and they will pay you. I got back 7.5k and first plus admitted not even listening to the tapes because pre 2005 they know that their scripts were wrong

The man handleing my case said that they would be charged 360, surely all cases that they mediate count as a complaint. As said before they are a money making organisation so they aint going to do some work and then not get any money

ok they might not tell you they will win for you, but simply lie and say that they have won for everyone else. This has not happened because I wanted 100% and they didnt get it for me and I dont believe im the only one

Forgot to mention that FOS get 360 quid from the bank for every complaint handled. This means that as a private company its in their interests to handle as many cases as possible i,e tell everyone that they win for you!

I tried FOS for a small C1 claim to see what would happen. C1 offered the difference between my charges and 12 quid, the FOS adjudicator said that this was 42% of my claim and that FOS believed anything over 40% was fair. I turned it down and I'm now taking it to court. tThis means then that A. Not all cases are settled and B. That FOS advise settleing over 40% offers therefore not all settled cases are 100% money back

Cambridge county court have stopped as well

If your case was pre 2005 they will wilt very easy. Pre 2005 they never had in their scripts to offer PPI they just put it in your contract. This means miss sold, they will therefore try to offer "maximum" rebate total of 78%. This is to try to stop you going for the miss selling. Request the tapes as a matter of course but first plus wont even listen to them

yes sent a request when I started it couple of weeks ago. I might just send a LBA with no law on it just the bare fact its not fair and that I would'nt have taken it given the option. Needed the money and they sent a contract with it added rather than requested

is there a LBA template around that I can use, just for a skeleton letter. Quite happy to not be to in depth just want to move forward and file for court.

My mate who I'm helping has the same, even to the point of barclays filing their AQ late.

letter looks good you dont mind if I follow suit?