It is done Google is your friend Served with evidence to correct section of high court. Let's see what happens.

With disabled & suspected cancer- no pockets in a shroud I have £200k to blow at high court and if dead by end of it don't care. N1 part 8 have legislation all sorted. Struggling how a timeline and exhibits are correctly attached Can a timeline be exhibit 0 and evidence 1-200? Are certified originals only shown at a hearing or must be sent to high court. Unclear on serving documents and paying court fees Thanks

That the legislation isn't meaningless words to be ignored with no consequences and to be in a position of equity as if it never happened. That is what I want.

It's not rocket science and my prior experience of solicitors is expensive, incompetent and palmed off to junior who makes mistakes at £250-500 an hour. Really don't care about money (no pockets in a shroud) roll the dice and see how it plays out already we are in communication with discussions to avoid court, so could file and discontinue if agreement prior.

What sort of costs? sub 200k not breaking a sweat as sold property recently

No win no fee waste of time IMHO as previously done MCOL and resolved on own. Part 7 guidance notes :- If you are not able to put a value on your claim, write ‘I cannot say how much I expect to recover’. I think it is part 7 form I need. Unless some kind of voodoo, as I understand it:- I can ask for reasonable adjustments, reference legislation as required and use Subject Access Request documents from Doctors as evidence. Unless missing something, it doesn't seem particularly difficult provided right form submission to court.

Hi Andy, seen pre action information prior. I'm slightly concerned that part 8 claim is non disputed facts and can't be used for default judgement N1 seems the court decides where it goes next? I have Doctors lying and the NHS Spine and Subject Access Request and CQC show clearly as a regulated service:- Fraud, discrimination after being warned by NHS England and CQC the legal ramifications of non compliance. I don't want a clinical negligence claim, I want a disability discrimination, fraud and failing to comply with legislation. I have tried ADR via third party the MP. There is supposedly NHS England letter arriving as the practice can't use NHS Resolution due to the breaches in legislation-the scheme wouldn't allow it.

The Doctor I was with refused to consult via telephone during pandemic about a issue prior- the end result was Operation earlier this year. Consultation in a wet car park with no medical equipment and members of public viewing. As a disabled person I made the Doctor aware that they should make reasonable adjustments in 2022 and it was completely ignored. Self Employed my medication was switched on and off to meet QOF Opiate reduction targets without review-this left me unable to work. Post surgery at hospital my care was handed off to Doctor for follow up tests etc- I tried in person to be seen as I had adverse effects and it took 111 and NHS England to get a telephone consultation and Morphine. Ended up in Acute Medical Unit as Doctor's wouldn't follow up. Went to MP as it seems ICB, NHS England and CQC all deem Doctors Practice not fit for purpose. N1 guidance states you can claim an unknown amount and use form for disputes. The Letter to MP can be proven full of lies as medication decade prior was allegedly short time, Subject Access Request show decade plus and proven lies. Fraudulently told my medication was at pharmacy and to collect( have proof of this) couldn't possibly collect as had been cancelled. Medication has been cancelled and reinstated as my medical records and currently on- not once have records indicated review or reason. Time limit for disability discrimination is almost out, MP saying not legally trained to help. Have read the court guidance, seen flow chart for courts. Have issued a notice before action. Plan to reference parts of legislation relevant and file N1 form unless the wrong form. Found number for filling in the form, will call them perhaps. Thanks

Without giving too much away as a disabled person I have tried to resolve an issue via MP ADR and my Doctor who has lied and can be proven lying, switched on and off medication that causes withdrawal and housebound issues. Self employed I had surgery and they refused post operative assistance and I ended up in Acute Medical Unit. The doctor in question is employee of organisation, so the organisation has vicarious liability as Doctor not on "frolic of their own" Subject Access documents, NHS App and letters from doctor to MP show the following are relevant and not compliant CQC inspections unsafe Health And Social care act 2008 Health And Social care act 2012 National Health service act 2006 Health and Care Act 2023 The Data Protection Act 2018 Fraud act 2006 Equality Act 2010 Disability Discrimination act 1995 Harassment act 1997 Autism Act 2009 The Human Rights Act 1998 Is this the correct form as I'm not entitled to legal aid and Citizens advice bureau don't have a duty solicitor. Thanks