Barclays dx, thank you for merging I just wanted to simplify and felt the original thread was slightly difficult to follow but it makes sense

Good Evening i requested pop SAR from a UK Bank following an ongoing almost 12 month old complaint involving the ICO and FO. I received 290 plus pages however it was evidently short of information. For example there were no email exchanges between me and the bank, there was no log of calls made, online chat conversations and no details at all relating to the complaint (logging of, investigating, outcome letters), for all intents you wouldn’t know it had been raised. They were wrote to immediately advising of the data missing and no acknowledgment was received or further data supplied. The 30 days / one calendar month has expired now by a good 2 weeks. There was also a GDPR issue sent to them where when the bank have disclosed investigation notes in evidence to the FO, the adjudicator has stated the notes contain references to another consumers complaint within my notes, meaning also my notes could be present in that consumers data. Of all people, the bank disclosed this to the ombudsman highlighting a complete incompetence in their investigation. I reported this to the ICO who said I must report this to the bank and give them 30days as they have to investigate and make the other party aware but it amounted to an inaccurate disclose at least. This was also reported to the bank and that 30 day period has expired now with again no acknowledgment from them at all. Some of the missing data withheld is preventing me approaching CRAs to deal with adverse payment markets applied to the account unlawfully by the bank affecting account holders credits for 6 months now. Seeing us declined for mortgages and any credit at all as a result, both individual and as business directors. The ombudsman have asked the bank twice now but they have ignored their requests to put their actions right snd rework the credit scores. what is best now they have failed in their statutory duty to disclose? thanks

Good Afternoon We have just succeeded with an Ombudsman claim upheld in our full favour. A refunded claim amount plus interest and a 4 figure compensation amount have been instructed to be paid. They have also been told to rework our credit files to reflect being in a position where the transactions and any consequences of the transactions didn’t take place. For us that’s a bit of an open statement as the consequences have been huge. I’ll use the example: 12 months ago a payment of £5000 should have been refunded to us by the bank. it was reported at the time yet it took 6 months for them to start the process. About 5 months back they pay refund in full advising it’s a refunded payment. We withdraw the much needed money and left the account balance at £0 with intent to close it. Two weeks later a letter is received advising after completing the investigation they actually hold my partner liable and will reclaim the £5000 payment which they call a temporary refund, having already advised it being a refund payment from the team carrying out the investigation. They provide nothing evidence wise as to why or how she is liable or any explanation as to what’s been looked into. They withdraw the amount (no overdraft set) and take the account into an-unauthorised overdraft. Despite numerous warning of hardship, and potential for it to affect mine and her credit scores they ignored it and left the account OD. Even requested they hold or freeze account till the complaint was resolved, again ignored. Month 1 adverse credit marker, month 2,3, 4, 5 same and 6 due soon. Both scores dropped massively. Ombudsman investigation is only into the initial investigation and outcome into the amount reported to the bank. The bank upheld and ordered as stated above. Now the compensation only takes into account the investigation and outcome of it, and not the actions resulting of short/long term consequence of what their actions caused. Consequentially the credit scores dropping has prevented finance applications, remortgages and resulting rate increases for both account holders. Adverse markers on the account I believe can still be visible up to 12 years on the account even if removed How do you put a measure on these consequences and the potential for it to impact for months or longer. My partners credit card had late payments during this period due to the £5000 not being available, could this be argued a consequence too? It’s been a horrible year and the amount of hours she’s put in to this over that period is very extensive which are all consequences with stress and worry over late payment letters etc. Can anyone help at all and thank you from us, happy to provide any more info needed. For the record the FCA are investigating their conduct, the ICO have a case with them as well and the FO have upheld in our favour. They don’t care!! thanks #don’ttellthemyournamepike