Yep! Lots of fun I bet they'll run to their solicitor and find a loophole to suspend the judgement and restart the process. After all royal mail shreds all mail that comes from courts accordingly to them

Hi everyone, yesterday I applied for a warrant (£83). The judgement was issued on 27/07/2023 and they didn't pay anything. They didn't respond to any court communication, so most likely they will claim that once again they didn't receive anything. I wrote to them once questioning how bizarrely royal mail selected important mail addressed to them and shredded it. They said they would've complained to royal mail about it My understanding is that the ccj will now stay on record because they didn't satisfy it within a month, is this correct? And I know the consequences for an individual with a ccj on records, but what happens to companies? Do they get bad credit rating and have any sort of trouble? I hope so. Thanks

@Emmzzi That would only happen in a company run by people with common sense. Let's not forget who we're dealing with here.

Why not? Genuinely, I knew they would never release those documents otherwise the ET claim would've been totally lost for them. Now, as my husband anticipated, they would either leave me alone or start messing me about with change of shifts again. In that case, this time I will not agree to anything, continue my shifts and when they sack me take them to ET with a much stronger case.

BTW, I agreed with my husband to sent an email to the tribunal to withdraw the claim, considering the legal advice we received.

They have a mix of paper and digital files. I will ask for their personnel data storage policy, but from a company that doesn't even have a social media policy, I don't expect anything positive. I tried to take my own notes and I was accused of secretly recording the meeting because they were too accurate. I'm sure some of you think I'm making this all up, but rest assured that it's all true, I swear on my kids life.

Thanks everyone. I expect an email in the next few days inviting me to a meeting to discuss this. Considering the runaround they subjected me to and the fact that minutes never match what's said (they claimed i agreed to things when in fact i totally disagreed), I'm only going to attend if they allow my husband to be present as a translator and supporter. They'll never allow that again. The only time they let my husband attend a meeting he made mince of them. When he asked for the hand written notes at the end of the meeting they refused and he threw the book at them in the form of acas guidelines. They weren't pleased!

Well, the 2 main points are: 1. They claim that when I showed them my passport (did this twice), they took a copy, marked as "original seen" and sent to hr. Then hr shreds these copies, but there's no trace or note that this has happened or that hr ever received the copies. Also, in the first disclosure they sent me a copy of a previous expired passport, so it doesn't look like they shred them. They've denied sending this passport copy, but the disclosure is on a .zip file, so they can't really deny it. Now they've asked for my passport again, so it looks like they lost the last 2 copies. 2. They insist in saying that they were not passed any document regarding my flexible working agreement when they took over under TUPE. After the first ccj they disclosed a rosta that I was doing in 2017, before the fwa. I asked many times how they knew what shifts I (and everyone else) was doing at point of TUPE transfer but they refused to answer. Basically they want to avoid admitting that I've been doing fixed shifts since late 2017. These are the 2 things that I think are not compliant with dpa. What do you think?

Ok, thanks. Got to do it tomorrow because I can only access it on the pc. Thanks again.

Wouldn't it show on mcol if they'd acknowledged the claim?

It says: "The following errors have occurred: 1. You can only request Judgement by default if the required number of days have passed" But it's been 20 days now. Issued date is 04/07/2023. What's going on?

No, not that I can see on mcol. Should there be a note there I suppose if they acknowledged.

Issued 04th july, 24th july I'll apply for default judgement. It's 3pm on a friday, unlikely they'll do something now. One question: the option to apply for default judgement has been there since i submitted the claim. It asks to fill a form. I thought that there would be no option available until the 19 days had passed. What am i seeing wrong?

Well, regarding the ET case, the defendant has employed one of the best employment barrister in the country. I even had a feeling she knew the judge at preliminary hearing. And my husband had the same feeling. After all they use (misuse) public money, so no cost or risk to them.

No, I didn't