Thank you. Pleaded guilty. Sent a letter explaining that they did not receive the fixed penalty notice and requested the fixed penalty equivalent.

Hi Looking for advice for a family member. They received a NIP in April 2022 doing 59 in 50, completed NIP form and returned within 5 days. They heard nothing until a week ago when they received a SJPN. A few things stand out as a red flag from the SJPN. Firstly the notice is post dated on the notice the very last day of the 6 months time frame from the date of offence and was physically received more than a week after this date. Secondly The officers statement provides date and method of posting of the NIP, confirmation completed NIP form received and copies of both as evidence within the pack. When it comes to the Conditional offer however simply states “to the best of my knowledge conditional offer sent and not complied with”, no date and no method of posting provided and no copy of conditional offer included as evidence. Appears the conditional offer was never produced nor sent and SJPN produced more than 6 months after the incident date. I have asked them to check the date stamp on the envelope to confirm when actually posted. If conditional offer was sent and received they would have responded straight away as shown with the NIP response. They wish to plead guilty but with mitigation explaining the above. Read various posts across multiple sites some contradicting each other. Some say request court hearing to hear mitigation, others say to just send a letter of mitigation with plea. Is anyone able to provide any advice please?

Copy of the letter property owner received, is it worth responding? In terms of the biomass boiler lease, the lease agreement expired April 2022, ASG contacted August 2022 stated property owner had to pay £2850 to own the boiler outright now the lease has expired, claim owner needs to check the lease terms and refused to remove notice on Title Deeds. As you can see from the letter ASG state if landlord was to gain full ownership then they would specifically state that in the lease, well it's not specially stated in the lease that ASG would maintain joint ownership but it is stated in ASG/NWS various marketing material and was stated by sales reps (untrue statement of fact was made that induced myself and many others to agree to the lease). Lease has expired, exclusion of security of tenure sections 24 to 28 applies, lease signed outside the timeframe required by law for terms over 7 years, breach of service levels, failure to keep the boiler within good working order ASS Letter.pdf

NWS4 LPP and Wood Boilers LLP are not registered at all nor is A Shade Greener Maintenance. The ‘solicitor’ named on the letter is not named there either.

I have searched and read a lot. Be grateful if anyone could read over the letters and the final draft response. Does it matter if ASG can work out who the Landlord is even though no names will be mentioned?

Issue Complaint raised regarding ASG with ASG and various bodies. ASG have not responded to any correspondence in relation to the complaint since. Now over the 6 months timeframe. Biomass boiler with ASG and having various issues with them regarding ownership of the boiler at the end of the lease agreement which has now come to an end, ASG are claiming they are joint owners even though they stated that at the end of the 7 years, 6 months boiler would be owned outright by the property owner. I have had various correspondence with ASG who have now threatened me with legal action making my issues publics and stating that I am making false statement on public groups which they have not provided any evidence of in the letter just state they are holding them as evidence in future court proceedings. What documents would you like to see and any advice you can give?