corsairrunner
-
Posts
15 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
The letter hasn't actually been posted yet. I figured it might be extra fire power in order for them to withdraw but I'm happy hold it for now.
-
Hi CAG, I sent the insulting letter as suggested. I received a quality reply from BW that I just wanted to update you all with for a giggle. The letter contained the normal rhetoric and nonsense case law, but the real giggle came in the form of the "evidential" imagery they attached to the letter. They attached pictures of a car that has nothing to do with me and was dated 2 years after my PCN was issued. I've followed it up with a snotty letter and I'll update you when I receive a reply.
-
Please see attached redacted letter. I had a couple of issues with the scanner however these documents should give you a feel for the correspondence. There is a couple of more pages of questionnaires. bw LOC.pdf
-
I thought I had previously reviewed a thread talking about the requirement to reply with the questionnaire, hence asking for clarification - obviously I'm incorrect. Better to ask and get it wrong than go ahead and make a mistake though right? I'll post up a copy with the personal information redacted for review shortly.
-
Hi CAG, So two updates for you: 1. I have today received a Letter of Claim from BW Legal on behalf of PPS with the relevant information along with a questionnaire & an income expenditure form. 2. POPLA failed to reply to my e-mail requesting information thus I have heard nothing from them and received none of the information regarding the case. I assume I just go about filling in the questionnaire on the LBC stating I owe no debt and return it? CR
-
Hi both, Thanks for the replies. HB - Nope it's definitely not an LBC / LBA. ericsbrother - Thanks I will get in contact with them now. CR
-
Hey guys, Some further correspondence from BW Legal attached. It's worth noting I never received a letter from POPLA or PPS regarding the appeal result as the correspondence from BW suggests. The first correspondence I received regarding the matter post POPLA appeal was the letter received a couple of weeks (attached earlier in this thread). I assume I can just sit on this as technically, nothing has changed? Thanks, CR BW Legal 2.pdf
-
Hi, Please see attachd I've only included the actual relevant content of the letter. Nothing in the letter regarding any employment or letter of claim details, just the letter attached and one from PPS stating that my account has been forwarded to BW Legal. CR PPS & BW Legal Letter.pdf
-
Morning all, I've received a further letter from PPS & BW Legal today, requesting payment be made by the 2nd of December plus an extra £60 on the grand total for their debt collection fees. From a quick Google it seems that BW are just another bunch of cowboys, lots of questionable reviews online about them. Typical scare mongering letter regarding a PAP and CC proceedings, stating I may be liable for court costs, solicitors costs (in a small claims court???) and liable to a CCJ etc. The main thing is, they have the correct address for me now which means no default CCJ. I guess I just disregard this and create a new "threatening letters" section in my filing cabinet? Thanks CR
-
All noted - thank you for the advice.
-
Thanks for merging dx. To summise, the letter from PPS effectively says they will now start County Court Action as I haven't met their conditions regarding payment. I'll write a brief letter to update them of my new address to avoid the CCJ default as per the advice from FTM Dave. I'm fully prepared to go through the motions with this one. I'll update should I receive any more correspondence from them.
-
It actually isn't entitled either. It just relates to requesting payment for the historic ticket. It just has the normal threatening rhetoric regarding county court action.
-
Hi CAG, I originally posted here almost 5 years ago regarding a PPS PCN I received due to the wind blowing my ticket face down. It went to appeal and I heard nothing of it, at least until now 4 years later! Essentially a letter was forwarded to me from an old address requesting payment within 5 days of the dated letter (which has now passed) or they will initiate CC activity etc. I no longer own the vehicle and I've moved addresses twice during the time period that has passed. What is the best course of action here? Thanks
-
corsairrunner joined the community
-
Hi CAG, Apologies if this has ended up in the wrong forum, but it seemed the most appropriate. It's regarding a data protection breach opposed to disputing a PCN. I received a PCN from CP Plus regarding non payment of parking at Stratford International Station and ANPR "evidence" of my vehicle etc. I knew full well I paid my parking and had a receipt in PDF form as evidence, off I went to formulate my snotty letter with my evidence to refute their speculative invoice. I normally write to the company, however I figured I'd just appeal online as I knew they couldn't defend this one. To my amazement, when I popped in my PCN ref and registration it stated the PCN had been cancelled. They clearly looked at the evidence after they decided to get my details from the DVLA. As far as I'm aware, an unintentional breach of the DPA is not a defence, so clearly there's some questions to be answered here. What's the best way of going about challenging CP Plus about their negligence and are there any authorities who I can write to to make them aware of their failures? Thanks
-
It is indeed a very strange reply. The idea of them "removing my details" from the PCN is an odd one. Logically you'd think a PCN with the details of the registered keeper being removed would result in the PCN ceasing to exist, as at that point theoretically there's no one to pay the invoice? No POPLA number in the reply might point towards them knocking it on the head aswell? Strange situation to say the least! Is it best practice to sit and see if this unfolds any further, or send them a letter asking them to clarify what they actually mean?
