![](https://www.cagtest.co.uk/uploads/set_resources_3/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
Robert63
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
87 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by Robert63
-
My wife has just received Parking Charge Notice from those lovely people at Parking Eye. The car park is a free to use car park with a 3 hour limit. She managed to stay for 3 hours and 11 minutes. 1 Date of the infringement 31/07/2021 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 04/08/2021 3 Date received 09/08/2021 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A 7 Who is the parking company? Parking Eye 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Teanlowe – Booths, Poulton Le Fylde For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. BPA Parking eye 001.pdf 3.67 MB · 20 downloads The site is a multiple store site that is used for all the shops in the surrounding area with Booths in control of the car park ( It was a council controlled site until the Booths store was built and the car park revamped.) Tomorrow's job is to get photo's of all the signage. Booths have planning permission for the cameras and signs not Parking Lies, I don't know if that makes any difference.
-
Hopefully it'll sort itself out. Any how, it's time to put in the defence, This is what I'm going to put. The Defendant contends that the particulars of the claim are vague and generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services v HMRC (2012) UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the defendant on its own account, as the car-park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowners. Accordingly it is denied that the claimant has the authority to bring this claim. 4. I any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of the contract with the claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original contract. 6. The Particulars is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to any relief claimed or any relief at all. I'm not sure about point 5, as they are trying to claim for legal expenses but appear to be representing themselves.
-
Here we go again guys but with the proper information. ( My fault sorry ). 1 Date of the infringement 26/09/22 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date 30/09/22 3 Date received unsure 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up n/a 7 Who is the parking company? Parking Eye 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Teanlowe – Booths, Poulton Le Fylde For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. BPA Second letter dated 09/10/22 Third letter dated 03/11/22 Then Letter before claim dated 18/11/22 20220-11-18 PE Letter Of Claim.pdf 2022-09-30 PE PCN 26-06-2022.pdf
-
My wife has just received Parking Charge Notice from those lovely people at Parking Eye. The car park is a free to use car park with a 3 hour limit. She managed to stay for 3 hours and 11 minutes. 1 Date of the infringement 31/07/2021 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 04/08/2021 3 Date received 09/08/2021 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A 7 Who is the parking company? Parking Eye 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Teanlowe – Booths, Poulton Le Fylde For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. BPA Parking eye 001.pdf
-
Well it looks like my wife has gotten 2 PCN's for the same place, she just ignored the letter's for the second one ( like I'd told her to do ). 1 Date of the infringement 28/09/2022 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 03/11/2022 3 Date received unsure 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? no 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up n/a 7 Who is the parking company? Parking Eye 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Teanlowe – Booths, Poulton Le Fylde For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. BPA And then the reminder. RE-PCN 13-51 26-9-22 - 2022-11-03 PE 29 days passed keeper liability now + 2022-09-30 PCN Reminder.pdf
-
Name of the Claimant :Parking Eye Claimants Solicitors: none Date of issue – 23/01/23 Date for AOS -10/02/23 Date to submit Defence - 24/02/23 What is the claim for – 1. Claim for monies outstanding from the defendant in relation to a Parking Charge (ref number abcdefgh/ijklmon) issued on 30/09/22. 2. The signage clearly displayed throughout Teanlowe - Booths Poulton-le Fylde, FY6 7DF states that this is private land, managed by ParkingEye Ltd, and that it is subject to terms and conditions, including max stay period, by which it it agree to be bound ( The contract). 3. ParkingEye's ANPR system captured vehicle aaooaaa entering and leaving the site on 26/09/2022, and overstaying the max stay period. 4. Pursuant to Sch 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, notice has been given to the registered keeper, making them liable for the Parking Charge payable upon breech What is the value of the claim? Amount Claimed £100.00 court fees £35.00 legal rep fees £50.00 Total Amount £185.00 Claim a..pdf
-
The saga continues, About a week ago my received a final demand from DCBL which we duly ignored, then on Saturday we get a claim form through the post. Final a.pdf Claim a.pdf I've just read over the Final notice and The claim form again and it seems that my wife has received 2 invoices from parking eyes for the same place but 2 different times., and the claim form is for the second time. I'll have to go over everything again once I get home tonight.
-
Parking permit terms and conditions
Robert63 replied to Robert63's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
DX, We're not sure, my wife works nights and hasn't seen anybody checking the car parks, I'll get her to find out. Ethel Street, the fact that she can be " fined " and the money deducted directly from her wages. I think it's the same form but I never got to look at it the last time. -
My wife is in the process of reapplying for a car parking permit for her car at work ( Local NHS Trust Hospital ), I'm not sure if some of the terms and conditions they want her to stick to are legal. T+Cs.pdf
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...