Hi Michael and Jamberson, Thanks for the advice, letter sent, I will let you know how I get on. Jimbo.

Hi Jamberson, Received the nto through, just wanted to check if the grounds for representation should be a) Because the alleged convention did not occur or b) There has been a procedural impropriety on the part of the enforcement authority? My evidence will be something along the lines of "My appeal against PCN **** was rejected on the grounds of the photo I referred to was taken of the time plate for the location at which the vehicle was parked. However, I was not appealing this, I was arguing the PCN issued stated my vehicle was parked on ***** St which is incorrect. At no point was it parked there, it was parked on ***** Rd which can clearly be seen by the photographs. As evidence, I had received a PCN the day before (no ****) where my vehicle was parked in exactly the same position. This PCN states ***** St which is correct. The photographs therefore demonstrate my vehicle was not parked on ***** Rd and therefore the PCN was incorrectly issued and needs to be rescinded. Please let me know if you think it requires any changes. Thanks, Jimbo.

Hi Jamberson, Thanks very much for the advice I will appeal as you suggest. I still have the first PCN and access to the photos which quite clearly show the bike parked in exactly the same spot over 2 days but with a different location on each PCN. I also contested the first ticket, taking my chances to see if I could get away with an 'honest mistake' and appeal to their better nature but understandably didn't get any joy. What I did think was interesting was their reason for rejection was the high demand of parking spaces and ensuring there is enough space. No doubt it has been debated before but why should a moped / bike be fined as much as a car which takes up the same space as 5-10 bikes (dependent on size of car)?

Hello, I recently stupidly forgot to park my moped in the free motorcycle bay on my road when I went on holiday. It's quite quiet and I found I had been given 2 tickets on my return. I assumed I would have to pay both but the second PCN had the wrong road location - stating Arlingford Road which is the one parallel to mine. I appealed on the basis the PCN had been issued incorrectly, as I wasn't parked on the street the offence was deemed to have taken place. The rejection on my appeal came through today with the reason: "The photo you refer to was taken of the time plate for the location at which the vehicle was parked". This may well be true but I was not arguing the location of the time plate, I was arguing my moped was not parked at the location they stated. If I am to appeal again I have to wait for the Notice to Owner. What I'd really like your help with is whether I still have a chance of winning if I wait for the NtO to come through and argue the same case? I attach a photo of the rejection letter. Thanks, jimbo.