Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×
Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

dawnporter

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    73

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by dawnporter

  1. dawnporter
    I did state clearly that.....ombudsman's investigation into the housing association says in writing " The person who opened her door, claims police and social worker told him they had a POLICE warrant"....When police where asked they stated :"We had nothing to do with her taking out a warrant." If the police show up at your door..social worker in tow, your suddenly opened from the outside. You are a woman and alone, then a person informs you that you are being section under the MHA, you are transported in a police car to the hospital. Police then deny they had any part in your section, what would be your thought process pertaining to the police?
  2. dawnporter
    She is an Orthodox Jew whose family turned her back on her, after she divorced her husband, she has no family support or even friends for that matter. There is an element of police harassment that i have uncovered, but wont go into it on here...Ironically I became friends with her due to having so much time on my hands, after being suspended from my NHS job. Getting a specialist involved isn't as easy as you think..no one that i have contacted wants to take on the case-and we are nearing the year time limit. Even the firms attached to the Mental health solicitors(she was assigned to while being under section) declined to take on the case. I have been told MH Solicitors in this Country do not like ''biting the hand that feeds them''. PALS in this Trust are completely useless, all they do is ignore emails...The Trust has being notified about the warrant discrepancy- we are giving them 14 days to respond. Parliamentary Ombudsman do not take complaints where one is considering going the Civil route...it is either or, according to them. I advised her to file a compliant against the Justice of the Peace who signed the warrant, so if they do go back and try to file retrospective court documents in order to cover their tracks...it would look suspicious, as the Court Clerk sent a copy of the 135(2) warrant and nothing else... The deception is deep, and the story is convoluted...and i believe the reluctance most people have of taking on the MHA, is the reason this Trust, its social workers, and CMHT are able to get away with their fake 135 MH warrant racket.
  3. dawnporter
    I edited the paragraph.. 135(2) warrants clearly states: ''to retake a Patient', this person was not under any kind of hospital hold on the date she was sectioned- she was in fact in temp accommodations. I helped her file a complaint with Housing Association regarding the manager who allowed access,-they ignored the complaint for months, so i escalated the complaint to the ombudsman. The excuse given pertaining to opening the door without consent from my friend was: ''We were informed the social worker indeed had a police warrant'. However the police stated: ''We had no part in obtaining the warrant, we did not assist the social worker in executing said warrant, we were only there to keep the peace''. LOL...I don't believe them ..but what can you do? The Ombudsman accepted Housing association's explanations and excuses. It took me over 5 months to get the Court Clerk to release the information pertaining to the warrant..I had to go through the ICO. After the ICO contacted the Court clerk -she finally sent my friend a letter with ONLY a copy of the 135(2)- signed by a justice of the peace, with the social worker's assertions that my friend was having a mental breakdown. No other evidence was attached. No record of a 135(1)....Now do you see where I am going? Yes she retained the 135(1) warrant by some miracle for 7weeks. Hospital claims they have lost the original, and hospital staff according to her tried to steal her copy of the 135(1). She was treated very very badly while in hospital. Social worker works for the Trust, so really she is a''small fish''...The ''Big Fish'' is the Trust whom i want to help my friend file a human rights Lawsuit against for unlawful detention, and other violations of the Convention.
  4. dawnporter
    HI, it was not done under a 136 as those powers are reserved for the police. A social worker gained entry into this person's accommodations by showing the housing association manager a 135(1) warrant -she lied and said it was a police warrant when it was not. When i got involved, I filed a complaint with the local police through the IPCC asking why police would serve a 135 warrant -yet negate to follow proper procedure. ..i.e reserving a copy on file. ..and making sure the address listed was correct.. . I got a response from them in writing saying they had no part in serving or taking out the 135 (i don't believe them btw..social workers and police in this country go together and work to together like bread and butter)... Then I applied to the Courts to see what this social worker presented to a judge (Justice of the peace) in order to obtain the warrant. It turns out she actually applied for a 135(2) which is for people who have gone AWOL from a hospital hold, she also submitted NO written evidence to back up her assertion that this person was having a mental breakdown.. When she showed up to take this person in . ..she presented a 135(1), which is a social worker warrant with no name and an incorrect address... .The story is convoluted, and confusing as it was a trick.. ..but suffice it to say this Trust has been caught red handed. ..I just have to file the case....
  5. dawnporter
    Thank you... will try what you suggested.... it either works or it doesn't........just want to make sure i exhaust all possible options before giving up.. if what you say is really possible.... that is if one can really get to argue their case at an hearing following the steps you laid out.....this means lay persons have found a way to play the same game they play...which is to stall and delay with every opportunity...
  6. dawnporter
    No, detention under the mental health act. Where it can be proven the social worker filed for the wrong type of mental health warrant, in order to get someone in hospital from a private location. Also Social worker did not follow protocol...person was held in hospital for 7weeks and forced to take medication.. Person was not known to services in said area There is more to the story ...as there is an element of police harrasment too..but as you know law enforcement cover thier tracks well..
  7. dawnporter
    Even if the Judge accepted the ET3 on the spot?..I remember her telling the other side to resend the email, and she will grant for the paper work to be accepted. Plus my Solicitor agreed to the Judge's suggestions?...Thank you though... i will do some research and will look more into that angle. Human Rights Does any know the average compensation awarded in the UK Courts.. if one was to bring a Human Rigths claim against a Government body..With deffinite proof they violated the convention? i.e Unlawful detainment... I have heard Judges usually award modest sums?
  8. dawnporter
    COPD is not contagious...what makes you assume the person has TB?. I dont think this person should be forced to see a GP and his medical record should be private..forcing someone to quit smoking is a human rights violation.
  9. dawnporter
    They can't be short of cash if they keep suspending workers over the littlest infraction for months on end?...
  10. dawnporter
    This is a deff over reaction..can't force someone to seek medical treatment..this would be a violation of their human rights...but sadly it happens alot in this country to mental health patients...with issues not related to their mental illness...but that is a subject for another thread.
  11. dawnporter
    The ombudsman should be able to put pressure on them to give you a final response...call the ombudsman back and tell them the hospital refuses to respond to your query re: final response on your complaints..
  12. dawnporter

    negligence

    dawnporter replied to carcrazy's topic in NHS

    Make a compliant to the GMC regarding this doctor..
  13. dawnporter

    Urgent MRI scans

    dawnporter replied to Sophks's topic in NHS

    I don't think you should wait on the NHS for this matter..an MRI on private insurance cost 300pds...also email the PALS department of the hospital and call them aswell to complain...the secretary was rude and unprofessional and she does not have the clinical knowledge to prevent you from getting a scan that could potentially save your life.
  14. dawnporter

    Chronic Back pain

    dawnporter replied to sandbag's topic in NHS

    Have you tried acupuncture?..treatments can be as low as 35pds a session and you can also get it under the NHS...
  15. dawnporter
    ...i dont even think one can get legal aid for ET anymore...i wouldn't even want to...if i paid a solicitor and he was crap how bad would a legal aid solicitor be?.... I dont mind spending 300-400 on a Barrister to look this over just based on the principle... Yea the paper work avenue was a long short...but gotta try to cover all basses when one is playing catch up...i have another job and i have learned alot from the experience...that is trust NO ONE in the NHS and always CYA at all times on the job.
  16. dawnporter
    That's the thing becky, i thought i was being suspended based on misconduct....but they told me during my appeal hearing for the suspension that i was being disciplined under capability. I mean its not necessarily anger as the NHS paid me free wage for 7months while i sat on my behind...plus they didn't think i would hang on this long....and they paid a barrister and solicitor to defend this case.... and i have another job...i just do not like been railroaded...i am sure there is a way... i will just keep looking... something will come up within these 46 days i am sure of it... no reasonable judge could have come to the conclusion this judge did...as i said my only mistake is having a bad Solicitor... The thing is.... i will only sacrifice to invest money in consulting a Barrister if it is going to be worth it...not into paying folks for a task and they cant even do the job...i could see if it was legal aid...but i was paying this solicitor and he did a very very poor job at defending this case. Ok so this technicality came up during hearing that my Solicitor didn't really fully explain..apparently the tribunal was missing paper work from the other side...My Solicitor agreed but didn't explain to me what was going on...I am now kicking myself as this could have been a way out for me to have the hearing postposed that day..i wonder is there anything else i can do now...based on what the judge ruled below regarding the missing paperwork. General / Conduct of the Hearing 2. The hearing was listed for one day and (as per the order of 23 June 2014) was to deal with the unfair dismissal claim on liability only (but it was agreed that this would include Polkey reduction and contributory fault issues). It was noted that the claimant was seeking reinstatement. A provisional remedies hearing date was agreed with the parties for 19 August 2014 (for 3 hours commencing at 10 am) 3. At the commencement of the hearing the Tribunal raised with the parties the fact that there was no record on the Tribunal file of an ET3 having been received from the respondent; nor was there any indication that either the claimant or the Tribunal had raised this with the respondent. Upon the respondent’s solicitors providing a copy of the ET3 and the covering email submitting the response (dated 16 April 2014), it appeared that the old email address for the Tribunal had been used. However, despite the absence of an ET3, no judgment had been issued by the Tribunal determining the issues, under rule 21 (2) of the Tribunal Rules 2013. 4. The claimant’s legal advisers acknowledged that they had received a copy of the ET3 direct from the respondent and both parties were ready and able to proceed with the hearing. It was agreed that the Tribunal would accept a late application from the respondent for an extension of time to present the response out of time (rule 20 Tribunal Rules). This extension would be granted allowing the respondent to participate fully in the hearing on 24 June 2014 (rule 21 (3)). This course of action was agreed to by the claimant’s representative, Mr Oliver. The Tribunal noted that to deal with the matter in any other way would not be recognising the imperative of the overriding objective (rule 2) to deal with matters justly but also without delay and saving costs.
  17. dawnporter
    Thanks steampowered. I was dismissed for capability based on my attempt to use a cauterization device a charge nurse had instructed another person of the same grade and i to use. My defense was that i am not denying that i did attempt to use this device, but that i was just following instructions based on what the charge nurse told me initially. I had no written record to prove i was instructed to carry out the task by this person. The charge nurse later for whatever reason made a compliant about me to the agency that i was working with...saying i was attempting to use this device without authorization...i was suspended 2 weeks after that...they say i was a danger to patients, yet i was allowed to work on on my regular ward while the concocted their stories... My defense was that the circumstances surrounding my dismissal was not properly investigated..i.e the person who i said trained me to use the device and..who i saw use the same device on many occasions(in front of doctors at the clinic and the charge nurse) was never questioned till 6months after the fact...the charge who made accusations refused to give any more details re: the issue... the judge noted all this but stated she saw nothing wrong with the appeal panel still moving to dismiss. Even though I had to bring these facts up at my suspension appeal, the lack of investigation that is and it was only then did they decide to questions these persons.. The persons i named lied and said what they wanted to hear in written statements. I asked the appeal panel to pull patient notes, where they will see the persons who i said said used the same equipment had documented. They pulled the notes..and it took 4weeks but did but 80% of the notes were incomplete..that is NO nursing notes was present and i was not allowed to comment on said notes-i just got the dismissal letter with their evidence... the judge noted the above during my hearing... The person who was picked to investigate my suspension was my manager on the my regular ward whom i had complained to about being followed...who then in turned placed a warning on my file based on some mades up charges just 1week before my suspension regarding the cauterization attempt. some many irregularities....yet somehow the judge felt this case was properly investigated.. Not letting this go..i will fight as long as I can...the only mistake I made during this whole matter was that i had so much other things going on..i,e homelessness, illness.. during the past year...i did not think to question my solicitor whom i trusted would look out for my best interest regarding this matter... He was so bad...the other side had to email him a day before we started to say they had made an ''error'' in my pay as the fired me 2weeks before i got my dismissal letter...apparently this is against the law... and i didn't know this...even the judge noted this and she said it...but my solicitor did not spot this .... I am thinking can i go for an appeal based on perverse of the law?
  18. dawnporter
    Thank you rebel11...i always find stuff out at the '99%'' hour ...wish i new about this forum before going to Court.
  19. dawnporter
    Hello good people I hope this is the right thread to post this query... I need assistance as to how to go about filing an appeal against the ET judgment i lost for ''unlawful dismissal''... ..This is an NHS matter ..the judge was bias. ..her written judgement even shows her helping the other side to clarify their case.. My question is... . in a situation where it can be easily be shown and proven that the accusations which led my suspension and later dismissal was NOT properly investigated ..can a judge still get away with using points of law like (Post Office v Foley and also HSBC v Madden (Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones BHS v Burchell case, As reasons for ruling against me?.. .I was under suspension for 6 months and virtually NO investigations was carried out. ..for exp..the main Charge nurse who leveled the accusation which led to my suspension was not questioned. .in fact she refused to give further statements. ..persons whom i identified as being involved in the situation were not questioned for 4months. ..it was only AFTER the appeal which was 7 months later that statements were sought from these people. ...and one of them claimed he was in Australia when i saw on FB that he still living in the UK... . I brought these facts up throughout the whole process ... and even in court and judge noted this. ..my Solicitor didn't really do much... there is so much more i can go into. .but this ET judge's decision and reasoning is the most ridiculous i have ever read... I was fired under capability rule... I dont know how to make heads or tails on this matter as it has been going on for a year. ..i do not want to waste money on consulting a barrister if i am going to get screwed around like my current solicitor did... thank you.. This is my first time on here and i will clarify if need be for anyone who can help.. .I am at a loss and i am willing to take this case far as i can.. .as i did nothing wrong ..i was ganged up on an bullied on the job. .then set up... I am from America and i am not familiar with UK employment laws... If need be.. .i can email the Judges decisions to anyone who wants to read..

Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...