Jump to content

Toots111

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    301
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral
  1. I've just talked to a lady at the Bulk Centre and she said that there is NO timescale during which a Claimant has to act, after the receipt of an N9A admission form, (so the 28 day rule that applies after their receipt of a defence does not apply with admissions). She said the case is NOT stayed, just sat on their systems, waiting for the Claimant to take further action. She also said she's never heard of a Claimant letting so much time go by after receiving an N9A. All very strange??!! What possible reasons could the Claimant have for not pursuing a CCJ yet? Thank you.
  2. Hi Citizen B, Thanks for replying. I already have a different case stayed, but that's where the Claimant has never responded to my defence. With this Arrow claim, I have actually admitted the debt, which they are aware of, so they don't need any documents Citizen B? It just seems very strange that they haven't pushed it to a CCJ, seeing as they have my admittance?? The court has not told me that this case is stayed? Sorry, that last sentence should have read that the court has told me that this case is NOT stayed.
  3. Hi anybody who can help, In relation to my post number 38, I still haven't heard anything back from the Claimant, and neither has Northampton Bulk Centre. it's now over 4 months since they received my N9A admittance form. I wrote to the Bulk Centre, pointing out that I have done everything required of me, yet have still heard nothing. I also asked in my letter whether there was a time limit from when a Claimant receives an N9A form, to them acting upon it. I have had a reply from the Bulk Centre, acknowledging my letter, but they have completely ignored my question about any applicable timescales after receipt of an N9A. is there indeed a time limit on how long a Claimant can be in receipt of an admittance form without following it up?? If there is, and they don't take any action within the set time limit, would they have to start a new claim again please? Any guidance/info will be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Toots.
  4. Oh, I see dx, I felt sure that would be the case, but just needed expert assurance. Many thanks. Have a good weekend, Toots
  5. Well, I thought I'd Sent you a reply Ganymede, but having just re-checked , it's disappeared, so I've obviously done something wrong! I just wanted to say cheers and thanks for being understanding. If I knew how to use the smilies on here, I'd send you a bunch of happy /grateful ones, but I'll just have to make do with colons and brackets, , , !!
  6. Thanks Ganymede, grateful for your reply. Do you know much about The Limitations Act please, or do you think somebody who does might reply over the weekend, (just so I know for sure - I realise I'm a pain in the butt with all of my questions, but I can't settle if I have something that I need a definitive answer to!).
  7. Hi all/anybody who can advise. Sorry for another question, but can anybody tell me whether Section 24 of The Limitations Act 1980 applies to CCJ's please? If I pay my CCJ as instructed for 6 years, I presume I couldn't then stop paying and use the above if the creditor chased me?? I suppose what I'm trying to say is I'd accepted that I'll probably have to pay the CCJ for the rest of my life, but then I found some info about the above act and wondered how/if it applies to CCJ's. ( I do understand that if a creditor hasn't enforced payment during the first 6 years of a CCJ, then they will have difficulty enforcing after this time, but what about in the case where the debtor has actually made all the necessary payments during the first 6 years and then stops paying?). I hope that makes sense. Clutching at straws I'm sure, but worth asking. Many thanks, Toots.
  8. Thanks Andy. My options are limited to the £1.00 per month, or trying to raise my offer. Thanks for your input.
  9. Thank you Ganymede, that's made things a lot clearer to me. Very much appreciated.
  10. Yes, I know Andy told me what he thinks I should do, but I replied , (post 274), and explained my reasons for not wanting to follow that course of action. I want an end in sight, therefore I'm still waiting for answers to my questions dx. So, once again, I'm sure there's somebody on here who might see things from my point of view, and have the expertise to please answer my questions, for which I'd be grateful. I don't mean to sound as though I'm ungrateful for Andy's advice, because I'd have been lost without him on here over the past couple of years, but surely I don't always have to agree with a plan that I feel won't be helpful to me.
  11. All I need now is for somebody to try and help with the questions I asked in my post before noon today, so if anybody out there can advise me, I'd be very grateful.
  12. Okay, many thanks dx, I'm SO relieved it's still there, phew.
  13. Got it dx, and it's showing under UserCP too, hurray!! However, there should be a lot more than 6 pages to the thread, so it looks as though the latter pages are missing??
  14. Oh, thank heavens, that sounds hopeful then dx! I'm praying it's retrievable. Thank you.
  15. OMG, my first attempt at replying had worked after all, sorry. Brain on overload!!
×
×
  • Create New...