Well the only thing to lose is I worry that if they got it thrown out on the technicality of the previous judgment then pursued for a few hundred quid solicitor's fees.
I really hate these Lloyds people!
My mother was in her 60's and was having a hip replacement. I defended the CCJ as a litigation friend. I appeared at the court 5 times.
Everytime Lloyds solicitor showed up they had no documents with them and just kept getting it adjourned by claiming they thought it was a directions hearing. They eventually had to pay me for my travelling costs and lunch (the judge ordered them to). I wasn't defending the penalty things as who knew about that back in 2002.
Anyway some of the balance was the fees and it's all those fees racking up that push people over. I haven't added it all up yet.
It got worse, after the CCJ for this UNSECURED credit card debt, they charged 4 times the base rate for. They then got a charging order on her house. All this after a payment schedule was agreed and a variance order agreed. The charging order meant that her husband was informed of the debt, as the court send all details to all the owners of the property.
So basically they charge 4 times the rate of a secured loan, for what they keep saying is an "unsecured loan" advertising it as "UNSECURED" and not putting any warnings like "YOUR HOME COULD BE AT RISK", but convert it to a secured one anyway!
I think the OFT is looking at this. If their intention is to secure the loan in the event of default they should warn people their home is at risk in my opinion.
Never bother with unsecured stuff, you pay through the arse for it and it will be secured anyway if you have a property these days.