Greetings
I would be very grateful if people could help me with a question that occured to me; replies to me here, or PM, or email me at ianhorsewell@hotmail.com
The basis of our objection tot he bank charges is that they are unfair, *penalty* charges - this means that they do not represent the actual costs incurred by the bank when a cheque bounces, we go overdran etc. Yes?
While checking my figures, (claim is in process) I found that the 'overdraft excess fee' charged by LloydsTSB has increased from £20 (charged in August 2005, I think) to £30 (August 2006). A 50% increase *in their actual costs* seems very unlikely, especially as the letters are sent by computer, without even a human signature. And inflation can hardly account for it!
It just seems that if we can show how each of these charges, for each bank, has increased over time, and challenge them to prove that their actual costs have increased in that way, then it would help us to prove these are penalty, rather than service charges.
My gut feeling is that they have realised their time is running out, and are simply making as much profit as they can, while they can.
Thoughts, ideas, comments? And hard numbers of price increases would be helpful - am emailing them to ask but expect little joy.
Ian