The only thing I can think of is something from a joint business venture with a small shop that went wrong many years ago. There may have been a small bank debt left over (a couple of hundred pounds) which was supposedly written off.
They would only have had my name and address to go off, and since my address has changed since this may be where it's coming from.
Because I'm thinking of going for a mortgage decided to check my credit file, hence this.
So, back to the issue though.. table 1 of a credit report is not quite as it seems.. describing this as an area only to record searches that are performed during a finance application process (and thereby directly with your recent consent) would no longer be correct.. it is now an area that any credit company, with a mind to, can access and meddle with search data with or without your direct consent?
This is surely being used more as a tactic to bring unavailable debtors into the fold and get their attention, whilst in the meantime spoiling their credit file because the searches will be seen by potential lenders.
Should these searches not be restricted to table 2 as this usage of table 1 was surely not what it's original use was intended to be?