HB, PPC thanks for the advice. Appreciated. HB, yes, my letter was indeed on the list. Fell better now. I will cease in worrying and continue to ignore in confidence. Happy sunny friday all!!!

Hello again! i have read some of the latest posts here and feel comforted. @ letshelp - thank you for posting the vid. i feel mcuh better with this. However, I have just recieved a 'red' letter from Debt Recovery Limited. They have ramped my fee to £149.99 and threatening court action, sending baliffs etc. I am 95% confident in just ignoring these, the 5% based n the fact that 'what if' my fine is the one legitimate fine whereas everyone elses are genuinely uninforceable. Just looking for someone to confirm (sorry! for the 1,000th plus time in some of your cases ) that I carry on ignoring this..... Thanks again everyone

All - Really appreciate your guidance. Im placing my faith in your confident argument. I will update on my progress, well, their progress as i will be ignoring them... THANKS!!!!!

Hi All, I got a ticket yesterday (w*nkers!!). However I have read through much of this thread and I have some questions, so if you can, please help/advise.... My UKPC ticket states on the back that it is fully in accordance with the 'Administration of Justice Act 1970'. One of the posts on here quoted this act, but the post was a couple of years old i think. Could they now have become compliant with that act?? Also, - this is from their website: Common defences and why they don't work The charge is unfair When we take them to court, people often claim that they decided not to pay the parking charge as they felt it was unfair. However, we have never had a case where the judge has accepted this argument. By parking at the site you indicated that you agreed to our terms, including the charges we’re entitled to make if you park in breach of the rules. I wasn’t driving the car This is a very common defence but a risky one. In many cases we’ll have photographic evidence to prove that you were the person who parked the car on-site. If you state in court that you weren’t driving the car but are found to be lying, this could be considered as perjury. This is defined as the deliberate, willful giving of false, misleading, or incomplete testimony under oath, and is a serious criminal offence. _______________________________________ So - does this mean they have wised up and acted approrpiately now according to the law - or is this just the B/S that they are trying to ply me with to make me feel this is fully enforcabel? Basically...my question is: should i 1) just ingore the charge notice and subsequent letters? 2) write the short letter (writing for cancellation as the RK....alleged contract was with the driver....I do not have to notify you of the driver etc.) and then ignore 3) actually try to appeal according to the formally laid out process. Please please advise! Thanks!!!!!!!