will do cheers its the implied bit I missed thinking it had to be specific doc mentioned thanks again done the acknow on line

Struggling a bit to find much to put in for request as by simply ignoreing my notice before action response they are cutting out the pre court protocols cobbled this up "Prior to the issue of proceedings I had responded to your “Letter Before Action” of 08/02/2023 as required under the Pre Action Protocol for Debt Claims as per Civil Procedure Rules1998 (CPR) which was signed for at the required address 11.33 Friday 03 March 2023. This letter was written in order to query, as per your instruction, matters relating to your claim. I requested clarification as to the authority of UK Search to act and if they were the agent or owner of the debt, invoices for supply covering the period any reductions made to comply with the low income and vulnerable policies in force and compliance with the “Paying Fair Guidelines” Despite the requirements of the CPR no response has been received. Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of each of the following documents mentioned in your Particulars of Claim being: A copy of all invoices and any associated items for the claimed period including any additional charges billed separately

Ok read it wrong then Apart from quoting the legislation the only documents listed are "unpaid Invoices" that does not give much to ask for and help with a defence

Having a senior moment the link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ is repeated twice but dont see a specific utils one it says use it but seems to be same link?

Thanks for support I have sent the response acknowledgeing service electronically and am getting the utility data request ready to send I suspect that having had no reply to my data request in response to the Letter Before Action sent recorded I may get no response to this as well. I may have misread the rules regarding pre court protocols but they would appear to say that a Court Claim can be issued only after 30 days after the Letter Before Action request for data has been responded to? Once again thanks in my 70's I am not as sharp I was

Name of the Claimant ? Southern Water sols Ward Hadaway Date of issue – 03 may 23023 Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – 1. The Claimants Claim is for unpaid Invoices relating to the supply of water and or sewerage provided to the defendant at xxxxxxxxxx for the period from 1/04/2012 to 31/03/2023 2. The claimant is a Statutory water and sewerage undertaker pursuant to the Water Industry Act 1991 with the claim due and payable under s142-144 of the act and the Claimants charges scheme. 3. The defendant failed to pay the said sums on the due date or at all 4. The Claimant claims interest pursuant to s819849 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% p.a. on the sum of £3260.29 from the due claims to the date of issue totalling £20.59 and until judgement or sooner payment at £0.71 per day Claimants claim £3260.29 What is the total value of the claim? £3565.86 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes responded to requesting details no response Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? no Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Water When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? No agreement claim starts 2012 Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ?None Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? No Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears” or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No Why did you cease payments? As far as aware none paid What was the date of your last payment? None Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No claimform.pdf

Sent off response to letter of claim as per pre action protocols recorded and confirmed receipt asking for details of claim and why this suddenly is raised covering a period from 2012 to 2023 As expected no response but today got County Court Claim I thought a response was required to try and avoid court proceedings but this seems to be a Court claim mill solicitor

not moved 20 years had loads of debts but all dealt wit upload.pdf

Letter before action from ward hadaway states southern water ref and uk search ref and amount no details how amount was arrived at uk search letter says water supply arrears I am not in their supply area and pay another company

Looks totally different to preview think last response answers but lets try this: Old car hp agreement properly terminated by section 99 notice "debt" sold on to various DCA On receipt of letters before action send copy notice and admission from lender they "chose to ignore" notice Nothing heard for a while then back to above now however its since 2009 that "debt" is supposed to have been accrued I think that while they could keep attempting to recover the non existent debt now having never ever acknowledged "debt" I can tell them that as it would be statute barred anyway I have no intention of any further contact and require them to cease all activity

Just trying to get this clear in my head, old car purchase properly terminated via section 99 sold on to various DCA usually gets to letter before action send copy notice and lenders admission they ignored notice see you in court it goes away for goodly while has just resurfaced ( with massive discount on alleged amount) but it is now since 2009 when the first alleged debt was claimed. As I understand it all the time the DCA contacts me and to avoid going to court I respond saying I do not acknowledge debt here is proof they can keep passing it around trying. Now if I say that I have no intention of effectively wasting my time as its out of time anyway have never acknowledge the alleged debt and have no intention of ever doing so they should stop?

"The court has issues a warrant to that address". The court issues civil warrants to a Person or Company at the address given by the plaintiff often the last known address if the person or company is not there repeat visits are not likely because it wastes the Bailiffs time and is against the collection protocols as in this case the Court has been advised by the Bailiffs superior that the address for service is incorrect and the matter has been returned to the plaintiff, the breach of collection guidelines is ongoing. Its not morality its law.

I did a quick electoral roll check no trace of name and Court Bailiff admitted no checks are done to verify. As for Police turning up they are welcome, I probably will know them as a result of my work, they usually turn up at the wrong house because they miss read or dont see the right number not because PNC is inaccurate what got up my nose was this wasn't a cowboy but a court officer and the possible effect if there was a house share and another person or a landlord came round and read it when in fact it might not even be a valid claim. Made complaint to Court

Came home and found a folded bit of paper in my porch thought its another flyer but before consigning to bin unfolded it and it was a note headed HM Courts and Tribunals Service xxxx Combined Court The Bailiff needs to serve you some paperwork please call the Bailiff to arrange service Name.....xxxxxxxxx........... If this person no longer lives here please advise the Court immediately Case Numberxxxxxxxxxx Big letters URGENT CONTACT REQUIRED xxxxxxxxxx Court Bailiff The person named has never lived at my address and is not on electoral roll and I have never had any paperwork for that name When I rang Bailiff started that you need to prove they don't live here er no I don't did you do any checks i electoral roll er no so why are you leaving details about someone else at my address didn't seem to think there was anything wrong with doing this despite the guidelines Examples of unfair practices are as follows: acting in a way likely to be publicly embarrassing to the debtor either deliberately or through lack of care, e.g. by not putting correspondence in a sealed envelope and putting it through a letterbox, thereby running the risk that it could be read by third parties. not impressed

had a t/o gram from R&W re an hp agreement with welcome finance posted about this some years ago In short Welcome despite a clear VOLUNTARY TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT UNDER S99/100 CCA 1974 attempted to claim this was a VS they chased for money themselves, themselves calling themselves Atlas and so on but eventually after being told shut up or put up gave up it surfaced occasionally as sold on but each time smartly put to bed I responded to R&W saying the y should read the file which they should have got from the vendor and realised there is no such debt, they say they have no data and I should send them the letters the file is VERY large since as I was sure of the position I enjoyed having some interesting letters. I have referred them to their own trade association rules regarding selling of accounts section 9 g,f which say the vendor should provide this on any sale of debt and any further info required after sale and intend to leave it at that no further response anyone any thoughts?