Perhaps I should elaborate on my original post ,

My objection to being arbitrarily punished without any provided evidence should be obvious,

I have been told that it is the states  intension to  prosecute me once they have found out who I am , if I do not tell  them who I am I have committed a further offence. Punishable by law ,  so far,  so kafta.

Once I have told them who I am , they then tell me I have 3 options, Two of them will cost me £100 , One of these Two  options will incur me £100 and 3 points on my driving licence, option no 3 is the ONLY option that I will be able to actually see the evidence that the state claims it has against me , but by opting to see this evidence it is in no uncertain terms indicated that I will incur a harsher penalty if not found innocent ,

It is this built in unfairness that I object to , I seem to recollect that at some point during my drive home having been to visit my   diagnosed terminally ill sister ( an irrelevant point ) driving in Sunday evening  traffic,  there was an ambulance with lights and sirens on , like any law abiding motorist I got out off its way , if to do so in a timely fashion I would have to accelerate so that I could enter the inside lane so as not to impede the emergency vehicle in its progress ,

If that was the reason for my alleged excessive speed then I would have a legitimate excuse.

I am not saying that it is definitely why I was allegedly doing 58 mph in a 50mph zone , but it could well have been , my point is if I am being fined £100 at the very least , and the Safety driving course is a fine by proxy , with no evidence offered then it amounts to a Stasi state extracting money by menaces, and I would be suspicious of the motives of  anyone defending such behaviour.   

I received a notice of intension to prosecute for doing 58mph in a 50 mph zone , this obliged me to name the driver of the vehicle , fair enough as it is a criminal offence to not supply  the information ,

I admitted being the driver , under the impression that I was being accused of crime ( i.e. speeding) 

next  i received a letter offering me 3 "choices"  

1, driving safety course £100 ,

2, conditional fixed penalty £100,  or 

3, be dealt with at a magistrates court ,

with the inference,  being that should i have the temerity to wish to actually request to see the " evidence of my crime"  then i will suffer harsher punshment ,

surely this is a violation of presumption of innocence , 

i am being co-ersed into a "lesser punishment"  under duress , 

help please 

Due to various bouts of unemployment, low wages and general lack of funds over a prolonged period my local council sneakily slapped an attachment of earnings order on me

( i was asked for a full breakdown of my income and outgoings , and they said they would use it to work out a manageable repayment schedule that would help me to pay off my quite considerable backlog of council tax debt ) ..

Unfortunately for them, the company i worked for, as a van driver/courier ,for considerably less than the minimum wage regarded me as self employed

.the AofE order couldn't be enforced ,

without further communication i have now found myself served with 6 onesource bailiffs notices running into thousands of pounds , plus 6 x £235-00 enforcement fees

But the original AofE i was issue considerably less than the minimum wage was for only £256.14 .

.. i also find it strange that the liability order date is given as 17th june 2010 ...

. but the AofE is dated as 15/3/ 2016 ...

Any help would be greatly appreciated as i'm now being threatened with schedule 12,section15 TCE 2007 enforcement , as yet i have not engaged with onesource as i am unfortunately out of work again, thanks