Perhaps I should elaborate on my original post ,
My objection to being arbitrarily punished without any provided evidence should be obvious,
I have been told that it is the states intension to prosecute me once they have found out who I am , if I do not tell them who I am I have committed a further offence. Punishable by law , so far, so kafta.
Once I have told them who I am , they then tell me I have 3 options, Two of them will cost me £100 , One of these Two options will incur me £100 and 3 points on my driving licence, option no 3 is the ONLY option that I will be able to actually see the evidence that the state claims it has against me , but by opting to see this evidence it is in no uncertain terms indicated that I will incur a harsher penalty if not found innocent ,
It is this built in unfairness that I object to , I seem to recollect that at some point during my drive home having been to visit my diagnosed terminally ill sister ( an irrelevant point ) driving in Sunday evening traffic, there was an ambulance with lights and sirens on , like any law abiding motorist I got out off its way , if to do so in a timely fashion I would have to accelerate so that I could enter the inside lane so as not to impede the emergency vehicle in its progress ,
If that was the reason for my alleged excessive speed then I would have a legitimate excuse.
I am not saying that it is definitely why I was allegedly doing 58 mph in a 50mph zone , but it could well have been , my point is if I am being fined £100 at the very least , and the Safety driving course is a fine by proxy , with no evidence offered then it amounts to a Stasi state extracting money by menaces, and I would be suspicious of the motives of anyone defending such behaviour.