Robbie_1984
-
Posts
8 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by Robbie_1984
-
Sorry that could be me misreading the letter, the letter states: "If the offer is accepted within 21 days of service of this notice you will be liable for our clients costs in accordance with rle 36.10 of the Civil procedure Rules SAVE THAT if you accept the ovver within this time our client will waive any claim costs. save that if you accept the offer within 21 days our client will waive any claim costs, other than those already incorporated in the above offer." Then a bit further down the letter is then states: "If you decide to accept this offer you must do so in writing and pay the Offer Sum in full within 14 days of notification of acceptance."
-
Hello all My dad has just recieved a 3rd letter from them, once again stating they recognise that our previous response was a template taken from the internet, and that their open offer of compromise is withdrawn. They have now sent a offer to settle under part 36 of the civil procedure rule, asking for £625 instead of the original £500. We have 14 days to pay it. my dad is now getting more worried about it, so some advice would be appreciated. Thanks Robbie
-
Well I have dispatched my 1st LOD to them, time to play the waiting game.
-
I just listened to the radio 4 show that was linked earlier in the thread and heard Crossley himself say: "all we're doing is putting them on notice that their IP address has been utilised, we offer a compromise, they're under no obligtion to pay it, but if they ignore us we will take further action" What does this mean? That the letter is basically a warning that my connection is now being watched, pay up if you did it, if you didn't just let us know and we'll forget about it??? That sounded quite confusing.
-
If thats correct then thats another foul up on their part, the letter i recieved states a different telephone and fax number to what their website states, hence why I believe so many people do think this is a plain [problem] and not taking it remotely serious.
-
How many people have ACS actually managed to get to court over this anyway? Is it just the 4 that failed to turn up?
-
Thanks, I'll send an LOD off to them in the next few days, but forgive the question probably sounding stupid, Law really isnt my strong point, but why do we not sign the letter and use a digital sugniture?
-
Hello All I've just registered so I can post here. My dad recieved one of these letters yesterday from ACS:Law (the Internet connection is in his name) claiming that we have apparently downloaded some hardcore porn film produced by evil empire/Evil Angel. They are demanding a £500 settlement. I havenot downloaded this, and with my parents being over 60 I havent even bothered to ask them if they have, they can barely work a computer. I am obviously not going to pay them the £500 they want, so am I correct in thinking I should start sending the letters of denial I have read about earlier in the thread?
