Thanks

I`ve still got all the paper work and tickets, original's, as you can see from the photos they could have been taken anywhere, no windscreen ticket just a letter 2 weeks after the photos. Surely this is attempted fraud.

Yes it is a dressed up letter, just two sides no other information came with it, cant upload it don't have the Tec.

Did not reply to them, received it 3 weeks ago.

No, I`ve had one of them,

Received another letter from gallstones stating court proceedings are imminent unless payment received within 14 days

No kids wont` be down till summer hols

Don't have the means any more. I`m a pensioner now and don't use it, this computer is nearly as old as me. I`m struggling even to find how to reply to the kind people who are trying to help me.

Yes that`it

Yes

Five years ago I received demands for parking charges, I did post here, Gladstone's are now threatening legal action. They state that their client has sufficient evidence to support any court proceedings. they are laughable as I still have the tickets for the days in question. the photos they sent are ambiguous at best as they could have been taken anywhere

1 Date of the infringement 12/ 02/2020 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] [scan up BOTHSIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] 3 Date received 27/02/2020 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up no 7 Who is the parking company? UKCPS 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Woodside Hotel Birkenhead For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. yes There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, BPA please check HERE If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here copy the windscreen or ANPR section to your thread and answer the questions ukcps.pdf ukcps1.pdf

Could you direct me to the forum sticky please?

Second ticket in a montukcps1.pdfh, both issued on a wednesday ukcps12.docx

different date ,different car

Guess what, I've just received another of these tickets through the post, same sort of photo as first one and I still have the ticket that shows I've paid, uploading the the scans later

On the 9 Dec I purchased a car from a dealer through hire purchase, the car is 2 years old and had a advertised mileage of 17000 . The salesman informed me that the odometer was faulty, but I could take the car and arrange to have it done at my local Vauxhall garage, as the car was still under warranty and if Incurred any cost they would pay. I did this,only to be told that the instrument panel did not belong to that car and it was second hand. Vauxhalls told me that they had to email Germany to get permission to reprogram the car,it was granted. After they had reprogrammed the car they informed me that the actual mileage was over 34000, I am in the process of rejecting the car. The dealer has admitted the car was mis sold and it was mis sold to him by his supplier. My main concern is that I will be the loser as the finance company will be reimbursed and he will from his supplier. I will be without a car and I will have to reapply for finance with no guarantee of getting it. I will be rejecting under the 6 month rule Any advice please

Thats the only photo they sent, If there is a website I cant find it,

I have uploaded scans I think, the ticket I purchased shows entry time 15 Jan 09.03. The time issued on the NTK is 10.45 The only photograph on the NTK is front reg

Entry time 15 Jan 09.03 valid until 23.59 Time ticket issued for parking charge 10.45 No windscreen ticket just letter through post

valid ticket displayed yet still got a penalty notice through the post, I still have the ticket, should I appeal or just ignore it? 1 Date of the infringement 15 01 20 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] 3 Date received 18 01 20 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Front Registration Plate 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] NO Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up 7 Who is the parking company? ukcps 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Woodside Hotel Birkenhead For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. BPA ticket+NTK.pdf

Can a company who have purchased a debt continue with court action if they cannot produce a copy of the agreement for credit card, when requested under cca. They admitted that they did not have it yet still went through with the court claim and got judgement by default.

Well this ones raised its ugly head again. the finance company agreed to a payment of £2000 for the first car and that debt would be cleared. now they have sent a bill via their solicitors for over 10k for the first vehicle this includes interest of over 5k accruing at £4.50 a day. There was originally two entries on their credit file now there are three, they want full payment by the 11 /9 or they will start court proceedings. This has gone on long enough the couple are distraught yet again, but its so hard to help them as lot of the dealings where done over the phone they just dont know where to turn now any help would be gratefully appreciated

The vehicle was purchased from Liverpool, give me an address where to send the information.I will pass it on. There will not be any phone calls, it was dealing with this matter by phone that cost them £2000

Thanks for the reply dx, totally agree with the above, I believe even without all the problems that arose at the inspection they would have had a good case for miselling as the 130 checks could not have been carried out I ts what the finance company offered that's got me confused, Option one : Walk away and owe nothing ? would this mean that they the finance company have rejected the car? Option two : pay £2000 and they would refinance them into another car why would anyone pay £2000 for finance? The credit reference agencies are showing two entries from this finance company. The first is for car no1 which was defaulted for possibly 2 missed payments while the dispute was on. The second is for car no2. The £2000 is broke down into payments of £60 which is shown as payments for car 1 surely this should have its own entry. any thoughts on this