To update everyone on here. I posted my story, and many letters, on here back in October 2008. Look at my posts. I never heard anything further from them and now expect I never will. I wish to thank all those who offer such excellent advice dsuring what isa scary period if you have never gone through it before. Those who are going through it now, be strong, keep positive and keep your stamps in your wallet. All the best to everyone on here...

I was wondering if anyone could answer this, just as a matter of interest.. Assuming that one of these PPC's actually go the whole hog and end up sending a Court Summons to someone who is not at fault, (ie. the RK not the driver), are there grounds for counter claiming in Court for wasted time, money, travel, etc?

Thanks very much letshelp. I will certainly be ignoring everything until the next one drops on the mat, at which point I will post that up on here too. Regards

I think I'm getting confused by your references to CPS and my login of CPS73. Could you please clairfy your last post? Thanks

Thanks Lamma, I have searched the Data Protection Register and the number they quote on their letters does not return any results. Is this illegal? Regards

And now for the Court referral letter. If it comes to it, I am more than happy to meet them in Court. I have asked for proof of the ticket as I never got one, I have told them I was not driving or present (only the RK), I have asked them for evidence of the offence (not supplied). Thoughts anyone? Let the analysis begin.... Would anyone like to come and join me? Regards

Now for the 5-pager.... Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 I have now received a notifcation to summon me to court. This states that it will be in a court that is not anywhere near my own county, or the county where it took place. It seems no matter how many times I tell them I WAS NOT DRIVING or even present, they still wish to take me (at the RK) to court. That letter will be in my next post, but please feel free to comment on the previous letters.... Regards

Ok, here are the letters I have received.... Letter 1 Letter 2 Letter 3 In the next post I will upload the 5-pager that spouts legal jargon.... Regards

Hi, I hope to get the images up on this site either today or tomorrow. In the meantime, I have just received another letter from them of their Court Summons and their intention to file the cliam if the amount is now received in the next 2 weeks. This one comes with a place, date and time. Regards

I wish to thank those of you who have answered my first post so quickly and honestly. It's a reassurance that this is all standard rubbish and that the legal jargon they spout has no grounds. I will certainly get their letters scanned in and posted - leave that with me. Thanks again.

Hi, This is my first post and I apologise for the length of this post. I have been following these pages for some weeks now as I am in the same boat as many others. My PCN notice seems to be steadily growing more urgent and is getting to the "closing stages". If anyone can advise I would appreciate it. Here are the details: Someone (legally) borrowed my car and parked in a car park of a Public House for 2 mins, heavily signed with parking notices. They popped out for those 2 mins to go to the building next door. They came back and drove off. 2 weeks later the PCN arrived on the doormat claiming the parking ticket was ignored. No ticket was ever issued. They claim that I, as the RK, am liable for the £60, though this was going to be £85 for no-payment of the non-existent ticket. I wrote back using the templates in this thread saying I was not the driver and I would not be paying. They wrote back saying that they have "verified through audit trail of evidence" that the car contravened the terms and conditions. They state that they process the PCN under the Road Traffic Act 1991. They go on to state that the owner of the vehicle is liable and they have checked via DVLA to get my details. I wrote back again saying that I am the RK but was not the driver and that I would not be paying. I also asked them to provide me with the "evidence" they had used. They wrote back (with no evidence) saying that I now owe £135 and should pay to stop legal proceedings and they would register the debt with the county court. The debt would then be placed with bailiffs. I wrote back (yet again) and asked for the evidence once more. I invited them to take me to court. I still dispute the claim against me and used the "cease and decist" paragraph. They have written back again and his time sent 4 pages of Case Law with it that they would draw upon in court, none of which mentions anything about my situation. It also tries to bully me into naming the driver under section 143 (1) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 whereby if I state that i do not name the driver I am in neglect because the person who drove my car may not have been insured. They have given me 14 days to respond. I have not replied to them yet. Any thoughts please? Thanks