hazza
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
120 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
suddenly! a spark! this is awesome dudes - and the wheels are turning in that AT LEAST lawmakers can see that there is a problem which goes against the grain of doing things right - although labour seemed to ignore the question completely - loved the Lucas : "I thank the noble Lord for that rather unsatisfactory Answer" - this is what I have had ALL along with the council, the bailiff, the police and the courts. No more unsatisfactory answers from anyone please - it makes you all look stupid and not fit for purpose!!!!! You can hear the initial cold, ignorant perhaps arrogant stance of Lord Bach, but he does say "However, I have asked my officials urgently to obtain comprehensive advice on the legal position" - where will this be published? I love the "I am disappointed that the noble Lord is disappointed" Please note that I am also disappointed that the noble Lord is disappointed, but more so dissapointed that the Lords are not taking swifter action at a time it is needed most. Recession is now. The dodgy bailiffs continue to operate on the streets everyday threatening to climb thru people's windows for parking tickets and the like with the full support of councils, police and courts. conservatives get my vote so far! but, i am still fed up thanks tomtubby, why do i feel that you are the most important person here and now that should be the one leading this debate in the house of lords explaining to them just exactly what the councils and courts and bailiffs get up to... with evidence and fact and Noble disappointment all around!
-
it's "a profession built on fear and intimidation" the police could be said to be a bit like that in the past - but the ipcc made it all fairer - and the police name got much much better we need an ibcc - at the very very minimum £100 an hour is cheap! £350ph is the going rate i believe - at newlyns
-
and so says a powerless third party ! you're only saying that because of your sole motive in all of this... money - someone elses at that.... it's not your money, it's not your property hmmmm. but do you still agree to take all that stuff for an unpaid parking ticket - and climb thru windows if need be? btw: your opinion is wholly irrelevant to my comment as you really have no say on the matter no wonder no one likes you guys and the reason why this site rocks an unnecessary profession for today and tomorrows world see: Medieval Occupations In the future... history lessons may say... a long long time ago.... the court jester made people laugh the court bailiff made people cry but society realised these were medievel and evil evil and in 2010 the [X] party won the general election and abolished these cry makers - into history i think baliff's have it easy... especially if legislation is changed and the gov get's 21C decent bailiff's will lose their jobs they may lose their homes luckily for them there won't be anyone to harass in their homes them like bailiffs do to us today... lucky for them, but a small price to pay i think the best carrot and stick - and perhaps most moral to get 'paid' in 21C is to [deleted]
-
internet is a necessity for me - and millions and billions of people around the world i will not sit in a cold room with a blanket and candle and say this is good enough for me - and this is all i need in my life- during the blitz for sure... but not in 21st century I have lots of respect for lots and lots of people but your comment, that i should have some respect in truth bears the mark of a society that i don't really want to... bicker Materialistic? You seem to suggest that i am not in need? and should not be on cag? and i sense you took offence to something i said - please do let me know, alas, I hope that was not referring to me but it seems i may have bonnetted a bee if i am that, remaining tongue in cheek, and in spirit de cag, you are a cold wet feesh
-
hey - i just read up yesterdays posts - wow - good conversation sorry if i offended anyone by rolloking anyone - i blame joncris - he used that term before and it seems quite apt in many places on the net as for your Q: (PS Hazza, why is it OK for a tenant to "take possession" of a property until a debt is repaid, but not for a baliff to do this with other property? I dont think I even need to say that there is no basis in law whatsoever to follow the process you outlined above - you would be rapidly evicted) simples! the tenant is party - the bailiff is a 3rd party i know there is no basis in current law!!! - that's what we are discussing aren't we? hypothetical and hyperpathetical theories.... in fact it is what you asked isn't it? viable alternatives to the current system!