This topic was closed on 10 March 2019. If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there. If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened. - Consumer Action Group

Right; exams are over so I can concentrate on this mess. MBNA (Barclay card) SAR has been sent but not back yet. Wescott on behalf of o2 wrote to say they would investigate with o2 and cease contact. Today a letter has arrived from Wescott stating that o2 have investigated and want pursuit to continue. O2 have removed their data (3 defaults) from sons credit files but have advised and I quote " the account was credit checked in the name of Mr ------- , therefore you are liable for the balance" Are they seriously suggesting that regardless of their acknowledgement of the error that they really believe son is liable for payment? Absolute madness. I suppose it follows then, that son is responsible and liable for the debts of people who share a similar name? They must be as the address and date of birth are not sons. And its a pretty common name too.

Not a problem GSMguy. You are correct. It is only the default I am concerned with. I have sent SAR to BH so just waiting. I have decided I would like to see the background to my situation! Then I will request the default to be backdated. Hope its not too long a wait.

: ) I can't give you any rep postggj as apparently I have to spread it about a bit first! But I will as soon as I can. Thank you so much. Off to start with Barclaycard then!!

Your right! http://www.businessbankaccounts.co.uk/2011/04/07/barclays-acquires-credit-card-portfolio/ Barclaycard took over MBNA just last month. I take it, in law, that they are responsible for any thing that MBNA did before takeover?

There is separate Barclaycard default too. Its for a lot less money and registered 14/04/2010. Will do some investigating. Thanks for all your input. Very helpful. I will SAR both MBNA & BC. Was going to do Equifax & Experian too.

Experian shows that MBNA reported a linked address on 05/07/09. Equifax shows MBNA reported a linked address on 06/12/2009 Both created the same linked address - son has never lived at the address First search is 14/05/2010 by UK search Ltd. The only DCA that has made a default entry is NIL/CREDITE LTD 30/01/2010 All the other defaults are in lenders names. SAR to MBNA !

No I didn't. My first priority was to get the files cleaned for son. How could I do this postggj? If we SARN the two CRA's that might show who had the earliest entry? My first thought on this was that it was actually the credit reference agencies who were responsible for the confusion as they picked up ER entries. The DCA's started as soon as son went on the ER.

The Equifax report is back and has been amended to remove the defaults. The search information still shows the DCA's, Wescot, UK search etc. Surely this should have been removed also? I think I will insist on this being removed, as its not sons info and regardless of whether it gets used in credit scoring or not, it would be used if any manual search was done. One of the DCA's on the file has written to son to confirm that they have already removed this but it's still there. Experian have said they have removed all adverse data now but have not sent a free file. They want son to request another file, preferably online. As all this wrong info has disqualified him from getting a debit or credit card so that can't happen. We will have to wait for another paper one. Son is very relieved and wants to apply straight away for a bank account with a debit card, as he is hopeful that he might actually get his debit card and mobile in time for his traveling to begin at the end of the month. Any body any idea how long it takes this good info to make its way through the system? He also wants to ask for compensation. Should he just ask or get a solicitor to do it for him?

I'm doing the two day introduction wiseradviser training in June. The coursers are accredited and should I decide to continue the subjects covered will be Dealing with Debt, Dealing with any Emergency debts, Income Maximisation, Negotiate with Priority Creditors and Northern Ireland Court Procedures. There are 3 training levels; Generalist, Skilled and Specialist. It sounds good.

Good timing too

Hi Rich You have arrived at the right place for help, just a pity that I'm not the right one able to help. But I'll say hi and bump you so that somebody with the right knowledge can see you. Acenden is a servicing company as far as I'm aware. They look after all the mortgage companies previously owned by Lehman's. Have a good read around the site. Theres lots of info on them. Good luck

Mcjohnston Post 38 & 40 I have explained this enough times for you. There is no point in my explaining to you again. Your posts express your somewhat arrogant and condescending attitude to my situation very well. Have you informed the guys who own this site, the mods, the site teams and all who visit here that you have decided to change the entire ethos of CAG? That this is no longer an advice and information site? That you have taken over as Moral Judge of CAG? If, for some reason you want to drive people away from these boards, well, you are doing a good job.

No I don't know that - but I will find out. Good idea. Thanks wannabe

I don't think you read the whole thread. I told BH that I was going to declare BR in 2008. Their rep visited the house and was told I couldn't afford the car.I did not decide not to pay. I couldn't pay and expected the car to go. It was left for BH to organize the collection - not me. In 2010 I phoned them, as I had had no contact from them. I asked for a settlement figure. At that stage I wanted to pay them money. I made contact even though I seemed to have for what ever reason, a free car. We couldn't agree on an amount, I paid them £400 as an incentive (their word not mine) to come back with a more realistic price. They never came back to me. And they have all my contact details. Always have had. Am I right in thinking that your concern with my situation is that BH have obviously made errors on my account, errors that, for once benefited the customer rather than the lender and you have a problem with that? For some reason you think I should take responsibility for their mistakes? By having a default on my credit file for longer than its supposed to be there for? Really ? And, no I did not have any allowance from my OR for the car. She knew I couldn't afford it, she told BH to sort it out. That's why they came to my house. Before you have another go my OR has been aware of the situation the whole time. I do not need BH to do me a favor by backdating the default. I expect that they will do what is correct.