Jump to content

slick132

Site Team
  • Posts

    30,552
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    49

Posts posted by slick132

  1. It's possible this is some form of fraud where someone will turn up saying they believe you've received a package in error and they need to collect it.

     

    So be cautious if someone calls at your address - you could end up owing money for the item.

     

    I'd send it back to the reurn address once you've spoken to someone and been supplied with a return label and/or instructions.

    • Like 1
  2. Ok, so mostly you were in the UK working remotely for a foreign employer who paid you from The Netherlands and deducted tax at source.

     

    As you were non-resident for Netherlands and resident for UK taxation, is there an option to reclaim tax from The Netherlands ?

     

    Let us know what HMRC suggests.

  3. Hi Hunter,

     

    I'm NOT legally qualified at all but have dealt recently with a a contested Will and a Caveat.

     

    We need to know if your sister may be willing to cooperate (as Santorini suggests above with a Deed of Variation) or if she would oppose an attempt by you to claim anything.

     

    The Caveat is something to be done quickly to stop Probate being granted.

     

    Even if you lodge a Caveat to delay Probate, the legal costs in challenging the Will may be prohibitive. Ring around and see if a Will and Probate specialist would give you a free 30 min consultation.

  4. Hi FRo,

     

    Have you tried HMRC's Tech Helpline - Telephone: 0300 200 3600

     

    Did you "Tailor your Return" at the beginning, so the online form gives you the option to declare foreign earnings. Just checked on my SA portal and there's the option - "Help about: Tailor your return 06 - Foreign income or income gains"

  5. HMRC's arguments pretty much mirror things they've stated previously in submissions.

     

    They're trying to assert the FTT has little or no jurisdiction in these matters.

     

    Also they say - The Respondents contend Regulation 8 of the Income and Corporation Taxes (Electronic Communications) Regulation 2003 is satisfied. 96. Regulation 8 states: “Any information delivered by an approved method of electronic communications on behalf of any person shall be deemed to have been delivered by him unless he proves that it was delivered without his knowledge or connivance.”

     

    The Respondents submit the wording of the Regulation is clear that the evidential burden of proof lies with the Appellant to demonstrate that she had no knowledge or connivance of the delivery of the information.

     

    I have said all along that you (Schipoo) knew Maxwell was acting on your behalf but never knew or connived in relation to the actual information submitted by the "tax spacialists", nor did you specifically know about FTR.

     

    Have you sought to join the other Group Action or are you going to make your own submission to the FTT in response?

     

  6. Hi Dixon,

     

    The submission is their Statement of Case referred to in the FTT's Directions dated16th August 2022. It was due to be in by 17th October but HMRC Sol'rs asked for a 2 month extension to 16th December.

     

    I assume all the dates in the Directions of 16th August should be put back 2 months and you'll need to comply with each stage of those Directions to stay in the process.

  7. Hi Mrk1,

     

    If you've reached an acceptable resolution, excellent !

     

    Good idea for the future - you don't have to pay in full for a car on a credit card or some form of finance to get the full protection of s.75 Consumer Credit Act 1974. Pay just £100 or more as part of a deposit by credit card, regardless of the total purchase price.

     

    If you pay between £100 and £30,000 by credit card or other credit finance, you get the full protection of s.75 CCA 1974. If the retailer lets you down, you can claim equally against the credit provider as if they were the retailer.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...