I had sold a MacBook on eBay for £639.99 and sent it with UPS. The label was bought via Packlink and no extras were paid for insurance. The tracking showed MacBook as delivered on UPS website however the buyer informed me that they did not receive it. Long story short, after the investigation by the UPS, they could not locate it and automatically refunded me £60 as compensations. I did not agree to the level of compensation and made them aware of it at the time however they considered the case as closed on their end and i refunded the buyer in full. I believe they were careless with delivery as the driver must have pos

I don’t disagree. However, from their previous postings / behaviour: I can’t say I’m surprised (sadly).

The dates have just clicked with me. The government Code of Practice with the 15-minute grace/consideration period came out in February. They issued this tripe in April when they should have been following the CoP. They would be idiots to try court.

If you are absolutely sure about the one-hour limit - then you can sue them for £750 for breach of your GDPR as you had done nothing wrong and there was no reason for them to approach the DVLA for your personal details. Then they misused your details in the most serious way possible in a vexatious court case. Have a think about if this is an avenue you want to go down, and if so come back to us.

That was over very quickly. Whilst the claimants legal representative was going through the witness statement the judge highlighted that the statement of truth was out of date. During my time to talk I highlighted that the judge from the allocation to small claims track had requested that the claimant also sends through the signed agreement (that the statement of truth references) by both company directors with witnesses present. It was noted that this hadn't been done. I am very happy to announce the judge was then quick to dismiss the case, all this taking place within 15 minutes. The judge also highlighted the discrep

You've got absolutely nothing to worry about with LowLife Parking... They're very good friends of mine Well, they keep wring to me, so I guess they must be Have a read... Here, here, here, here, here and here Now while my situation is different to yours, you'll gather from the above that LowLife Parking couldn't organise a drinking session in a brewery! They only survive on the income from people that are too meek to stand up to their bully boy tactics. You'll get all the usual, NTK, NTK Reminder and then a "legal action pending', perhaps interspersed with beg/threat-o-grams from Debt Recovery Plus (DR+) their tame DCA (who

Another British success story .. taking itself and its profits abroad "(Reuters) -- British chip technology company Arm, owned by Japanese conglomerate SoftBank Group, said on Friday it will pursue a U.S.-only listing this year, ending speculation about a primary or a secondary listing in the U.K. Arm is the world's biggest supplier of chip design elements used in smartphones, selling intellectual property to companies such as Apple and Qualcomm." SoftBank's Arm rebuffs London by choosing U.S. listing WWW.REUTERS.COM Arm, the chip designer owned by Japan's SoftBank , sa