The entire republican party is corrupt to the core. We have out issues with our parties here, but damn, the states is basically a clusterf***. Trumps been c[aught lying, commiting illegal activities, and hes still being defended. Even the US justice department is starting to be his personal lawyer due to Barr.

anyway, back to handcock saying people must have symptoms before they are tested. Has nobody told him that 75-80% of infected people are asymptomatic? About time somebody did before we get a really uncontrolled outbreak - or is that what he prefers rather than owning up to his own BS claims re testing and testing capacity? Does he really prefer people die rather than he ( handcock) is simply a tiny little more clearly shown to be just another self-serving liar

IN my opinion please guilty and ask to be sentenced at the Fixed Penalty equivalent, in line with the guidelines ...

Then put the 11th...its irrelevant really...the defendant will have 19 days to acknowledge service

You must put in writing to the insurer today confirming that the policy should be cancelled from 3rd September because you sold the vehicle on that date and no longer have any interest in it. Send them a copy of whatever evidence you have that the vehicle was sold. Also if they sent you a Certificate of Insurance by post when you last renewed the policy post it back to them. (Today because it's 7 days from the date you sold the vehicle and there's 7 day deadline for returning the certificate) Don't wait for your friend to write a letter to insurers, you must take action immediately to write to your insurers. A letter from your friend, as suggested in post 3, would also be helpful. I'd ask the friend to give the letter to you so you can be certain your insurers get it and you know what it says. There is no claim under your policy. Only you can make a claim under your policy and you aren't because at the time of the accident you didn't own the vehicle and weren't driving the vehicle. I do not agree with unclebulgaria that this will be recorded as a claim against your policy. The insurer may attempt to do that but they are not entitled to because it is not a claim under your policy. If your insurer has to pay the third party (and the law's not at all clear in cases like this where the vehicle had already been sold) it would be dealt with by what's known as a 'Section 151 claim'. That is not a claim under your policy. This paragraph from a recent seminar on s151 claims is relevant to your situation, although unfortunately it only confirms that the law is unclear. https://www.2tg.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/2TG-Guidance-Note-Motor-Insurance-Law-for-Learners-JMD-5.5.2020.pdf

Quick question, but from reading this, I get the impression that you have not had the body works carried out, is this correct? if you have an estimate but not had the works carried out, then you have not yet sustained this loss yet and it may be questioned why you didn’t get it repaired in the last two years and that as so long has passed that it does not really need any repair. If the estimate is from a main dealer, it is likely that a local garage would also be able to repair for a much lower price too so if you was to get it repaired, your loss may be much less than previously thought.