Thanks for all the help letters have now been sent to smart & CST i will post up any further correspondence i receive from either of them.  

Here as asked for is my correspondence between myself and smart parking the appeal was done on line so this is what i received back after sar to smart parking. If everything is ok i will type the letter proposed by FTM Dave(many thanks) and send it off to cst law & smart parking tomorrow.

sp.pdf (3).pdf

In answer to honeybee13

unfortunately it was a very windy day when i attended the hospital and the ticket blew out of my vehicle as i got back in and i never gave it a thought that i might need it again.

Thanks for all  the other advice i will as suggested wait to see what your thoughts are and the best letter to send off to cst law,

i have received  2 drp 2 zenith and 2cst letters up to now.

Once again thanks for all the help in what was developing into a very stressful situation.

There was a glaring error on the letter of rejection but i didn't want to state it on here incase i was required to use it if it went to court not sure how i would send it for a member to look privately at it.

Yes that's correct and also it was a pay car park £2 for 14hrs. i spent 76mins at the car park before leaving.

1 Date of the infringement

29/1/2020
 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' d
10/02/2020

[scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide]

please do not put JPG Picture files into your post

3 Date received

13/2/2020
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N
N

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the even
YES

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal]
Y

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up

Y
 

7 Who is the parking company?

Smart Parking Ltd

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town]

Hardwick Road, Stockton on tees
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

BPA

docs1.pdf

The owner of a vehicle received a parking ticket from smart parking and asked me to deal with it as i was the driver,  i disputed this as i believed i had entered one wrong digit.

Smart parking claim they rejected my appeal by letter that i did not receive but then started contacting me by email to refuse to give me any more information,

they then passed the debt on to DRP 

then zenith and

now finally CST law have sent a LBC to my address

i have not acknowledged any of the letters as they are addressed to Mrs and i am Mr.

I have now sent smart parking a SAR and received back the results in which they confirm i did enter a wrong digit but one letter in the same envelope is addressed to mrs and one mr.

just reading the BPA new rules i was perhaps under the false elusion this should of been cancelled at the first appeal

any help would be much appreciated.