because you said the court was also questioning it! and, you didn't provide the full order of the bit re the wit statements, and re your post #72 saying the letter was re the fee that's why. and, i gave advice. both late (you said they haven't disclosed), then both might get away with it being late. up to the J on the day. good luck. am out. remember, the help you get on cag is free and voluntary by the good will of caggers.

All well and good, but don't make the mistake of burying your head in the sand and imagining it will go away just because you want it to. Make sure you follow the sage advice given by EB and others on here, sending letters in accordance with court-imposed timelines, but you WILL be expected to do some reading around the field for yourself, both on other threads here and on a blog by a guy called the Parking Prankster (who frequently posts on the outcomes of recent court cases, including the case numbers). It is useful to include those that are RELEVANT as part of your defence, because while judgements in County Court do not set formal legal precedent (as would cases heard in a higher court or a criminal court), district judges don't often like to buck a trend by going against previous judgements. Always make sure you keep the thread updated when you get any correspondence in relation to the matter, and advice will invariably be forthcoming. Good luck!