you seem to be spamming the name of the company in a search engine optimisation vendetta. Very childish. Also if everyone is over 18 they can shag who they like. Their complaints are not yours, and no one seems to have asked you to white knight for them. They can complain themselves if bothered. Move on. Live well. Be happy. Let it go. It's the mature thing to do.

I just keep it short and sweet.... Dear DCA I am compiling a list of my creditors with a view to going bankrupt. Please supply full details of the alleged debt and you will be included in the list. Even if I don't hear from you the communication previously sent will be added. Goodbye and don't forget to NEVER call me on the phone as I can't afford one.

Seamus, first of all you said this: 'I rang this morning to cancel as circumstances have changed' which kind of implies you'd lost your job or something major had happened. And then you say this: 'and als there were three owners on the car which is normally ok but when two of them had been within the last 11 months you have gotta ask why. which I did but the reply I received when I thought about it, I had my doubts about the car and I was not prepared to take the chance' Which kind of implies buyer's remorse. As you've found out, buyers remorse costs money. sorry mate. it's your own fault, can't say I blame the dealer at all now.

That is what we need more of-compliments instead of complaints. I had cause to write to my local council and I marked my letter Formal Compliment. I wonder how long it took them to realise it wasn't a complaint

Then I found this from hmrc If there is a charge for your treatment, and you get tax credits because you're on a low income, you could get help. This help includes: free NHS/HS prescriptions, wigs and fabric supports - if they are not already free free dental treatment and eyesight tests vouchers towards the cost of glasses or contact lenses help with the cost of travel for some NHS/HS treatment

I've watched this posting with much amusement. We see them all the time here. It has though raised some interesting questions especially on the actions of some of the site team as Mike has pointed out in relation to posts being removed/edited etc. I have in mind a particular post in relation to a DPF issue when it was pointed out that he/she would lose was totally removed after the OP did in fact lose big time. Now in this case, removing all the noise surrounding it, it comes down to an interpretation of the law and the definition of what is unroadworthy and what is not. SOGA clearly states that the car should be roadworthy but it also states that it should be commensurate with age and mileage and it should be expected that an older cheaper car will not be perfect. Now the question is how do you determine this? The car had a valid MOT and the advisories from the last MOT were made known to the buyer. The car was checked by an independent person as well. On examination by another garage they pointed out faults which are not what I would consider as serious as individual items in their own right as are items showing wear commensurate with the age mileage and price. The only one I would say is a no no is the drop link not secured. Bring all of these together and you have a car that will not indeed handle well. However the statement drives well is open to interpretation. The problem is the MOT. At the time of test, the testers interpretation of what he/she saw at the time was that in their opinion it would need changing before the next MOT. The seller is not obliged to do this work prior to sale as he has an official statement that the car will last until the next MOT safely. The seller's responsibility is to ensure it complies in terms of tyre tread etc which he has done. I cannot see that dealer has done anything wrong here other than comply and the OP is trying to take the **** thinking she gets a brand new car for £800 and even has the audacity to try and claim for the fuel she has put in and the routine maintenance required to get a cheap car to the required standard. As Scania has pointed out.....if you don't know ...get an expert to check. Overall, for a few quid spent on what is routine maintenance, which is commensurate with the price paid and age plus mileage, despite the battle scars, she might actually have a good car.

He won't appear as he is a salaried employee of HMCTS.

I don't think any Judge is going to be impressed by that! Go to the Court first thing. This guy may well be in trouble.

Then you have to go to the court tomorrow morning. He is not allowed to edit documents like that without the authority of the court. HE would need to serve a full fresh claim on your wife. Not tip-ex your name out and put hers in.

What a beauty.

sparky514: Unfortunately, for your son, the answer is yes, subject to a couple of variations. He can not be forced to undertake any medical treatment - This includes seeing a health professional. He can not be forced to apply for jobs or take up work, nor can he be forced to "volunteer" for work experience. There is a different template that the provider must use when mandating an ESA participant - See Chapter 3a of the DWP provider guidance for examples. However, some providers ignore the guidance notes and think they can make up the rules as they go along. As for the advice given in this thread (and others), it still applies to your son: Never sign anything. Keep copies of ALL paperwork. Demand printouts of ALL notes stored on computer. Record ALL conversations. Travel expenses must be refunded in full with no strings attached (as long as a receipt or ticket is provided) I would also add: Never discuss personal issues in a public area, and always demand a private room.