Jump to content

Leaderboard

  1. flumps1976

    flumps1976

    Registered Users

    Change your profile picture


    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      2,038


  2. Desperate Daniella

    Desperate Daniella

    Registered Users

    Change your profile picture


    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      6,086


  3. Raven1

    Raven1

    Registered Users

    Change your profile picture


    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      112


  4. becky2585

    becky2585

    Registered Users

    Change your profile picture


    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      2,445


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/06/13 in all areas

  1. The information you were told about occupational pensions is correct, the £50 disregard is only applied to contribution based JSA which you would not be eligible for if you have been in receipt of JSA during the two tax years that they would use to assess your claim for JSA. If you register for JSA then yes you will be signing the usual JSAg and need to follow the steps as agreed. If you know that you have already paid sufficient pension contributions then it is your choice if you claim JSA or not. As your job was for an 11 week period it could be treated as "Employment on Trial" and no referral would be referred to DMA (employed for a
    1 point
  2. Hello Logically, a permanent member of staff is unlikely to be in a position where they need to apply for their own jobs, so that isn't likely to be a comparative scenario! You have the right not to be treated less favourably due to your fixed term status - so the company must advertise the vacancy and offer you the opportunity to apply. If you failed the assessment, that will be the reason they didn't offer you the post - unless you can prove you should have passed, and they purposely failed you due to your fixed term status alone - which could be tricky.
    1 point
  3. I contacted my local MP via twitter and these are the responses I received:- "I have been assured you do not have to give your login and/or password but you will be asked to show evidence of your searches." "Was very senior DWP who confirmed so if you have any problem give me details and I will take it up."
    1 point
  4. Stop it. They asked for an "average" weekly cost. That means working out what it is likely to be over a period of time. You anticipated you'd be using the child carer but sometimes things changed. That is completely understandable, especially in light of your mum's operation and her needing some company to cheer her up. Do sit down though, quietly with a cup of tea, and cast your mind back and try to remember what you included/didn't include when you were doing the first estimated figures just in case you suddenly remember something. Did you, for example, include travelling costs to the childminder when you worked it out? O
    1 point
  5. What's a WUM? As someone who was singled out for particular attention in *the post* I say this in response, this thread is about self respect; refusing to let yourself be brought down by the unacceptable behaviour of others. And certainly not about starting to behave like them. One of my favourite quotes is: 'No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.' But sometimes we all need a helping hand and thankfully others are often happy to give it, and later on you can become the helper. I started this thread (what seems like a very a long time ago now) because my very first appointment with ingeus left me feeling l
    1 point
  6. Look at this story re Arrow Global. http://www.credittoday.co.uk/article/15324/online-news/debt-portfolio-purchases-boost-arrow-global-results They bought debts worth £804m for just £33m – or 4%. If I sold something worth £100 to someone for just £4, I’ve have the money laundering police at my door in five seconds flat... And in the meantime, the companies selling the debt simply write the whole lot off against tax. Look at the language of the quotes in that article. Debtors are simply regarded as ‘accounts’ and ‘assets’, never as human beings with problems (though I acknowledge many debtors are actually avoiders).
    0 points
  7. Your not in a criminal court and that line is a copy and paste of many DAW policies, the bit that is missing is "Isolated incidents of" how many incidents did you evidence
    0 points
  8. Ok. FOllow the advice CB posted in post #2 so people can help further.
    0 points
  9. The LL is most definitely liable as he allowed this to happen with full knowledge of the consequences that would arise, a 'letter before action'' is the logical next move.
    0 points
×
×
  • Create New...