No, I don't believe your son was in the wrong....just a few comments... Firstly, the Landlord should have been insured for such damages. If he wasn't insured then given that his nephew was prosecuted, he should have been pursuing him for any damages and not your son. Regarding the court case, were you given an opportunity to specify dates of unavailability? I would be inclined to ring the court on Monday and explain that you are away and what you should do in order to get the date moved....that's assuming you want to be there. If not then let it stand. Given that the application to set aside has been dismissed once already

There won't be a credit agreemnt with Paypl, so send a "prove it" letter instead. There is no fee required with that. The Consumer Forums - Debt collectors

More info in this one. Obviously edit and delete as appropriate. xxxxxx 2009. Dear xxxxxxxxx, ACCOUNT IN SERIOUS DISPUTE Re account no xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I write regarding recent communication regarding the above account. Further to my request under the above act, your attention is drawn to the fact that this account remains subject to a lawful serious dispute. On xxxxxxxx, by recorded delivery, I requested that you supply me a copy of the executed credit agreement covering this account pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 section 78, a copy of this request is enclosed. To date you have failed

I had the same problem. Tried sending the letters back "unknown at this address", tried contacting the DCA's by phone, sent letter after letter telling them that the person did not live at my address - nobody was willing to listen. I had enough after I had representatives appear at my doorstep, some of which accepted the situation and some who were very threatening in their mannerisms....I wrote the below letter in a fit of absolute fury after a rep scared my daughter with the way he behaved toward me, sent it to every company that letters arrived from and I have heard nothing at all since.

yes ida x

Tenants have signed a 12 month AST with a break clause at 6 months. If they wish to exercise this break clause they must give you notice before November 6 that they wish to leave on January 6. THEY ARE LIABLE FOR THE RENT UP TO THIS DATE, regardless of whether they stay or go. However - they have obviously fraudulently signed the AST knowing full well that they would be breaching its terms by keeping all of these animals. You say you are abroad - so did LA just find and reference tenant, or is LA managing the property? (If not, who is managing property in your absence?) How much deposit did tenants pay and which scheme is it p

It's really all guess work at this stage spam & a matter of who blinks first. See if andy or car have any ideas, they have experience & better several heads than one eh?

Testing, testing One TWO, one TWO. ...........any good ??